Abstract
Penrose, Edith T. (1914–1996) book (1959) provides a theory of the growth of the firm, maintaining that the binding constraint on the rate of the growth of the firm arises from the limited capacities of its existing management. This managerial constraint on the rate of growth of the firm is known as the Penrose effect. The article discusses the reasons why the Penrose effect arises, reviews how this effect has been empirically examined, and suggests some future research directions.
Keywords
- Penrose Effect
- Management Constraints
- Existing Business Activities
- Entrepreneurial Services
- Managerial Diseconomies
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Augier, M., and D.J. Teece. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review 47: 175–192.
Chandler, A.D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gander, J.P. 1991. Managerial intensity, firm size and growth. Managerial and Decision Economics 12: 261–266.
Goerzen, A., and P.W. Beamish. 2007. The Penrose effect: ‘Excess’ expatriates in multinational enterprises. Management International Review 47: 221–239.
Hay, D.A., and D.J. Morris. 1991. Industrial economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hutzschereuter, T., J.C. Voll, and A. Verbeke. 2011. The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: A Penrosean perspective. Journal of Management Studies 48: 305–329.
Kor, Y.Y., and J.T. Mahoney. 2000. Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies 37: 109–139.
Lockett, A., J. Wiklund, P. Davidsson, and S. Girma. 2011. Organic and acquisitive growth: Re-examining, testing, and extending Penrose’s growth theory. Journal of Management Studies 48: 48–74.
Mahoney, J.T., and J.R. Pandian. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 13: 363–380.
Mortensen, D.T. 1973. Generalized costs of adjustment and dynamic factor demand theory. Econometrica 41: 657–665.
Orser, B.J., S. Hogarth-Scott, and A.L. Riding. 2000. Performance, firm size, and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management 38: 42–58.
Penrose, E.T. 1955. Limits to the growth and size of firms. American Economic Review 45: 531–543.
Penrose, E.T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, E.T. 1960. The growth of the firm: A case study of the Hercules Powder Company. Business History Review 34: 1–23.
Pitelis, C., and A. Verbeke. 2007. Edith Penrose and the future of the multinational enterprise: New research directions. Management and International Review 47: 139–149.
Richardson, G.B. 1964. The limits to a firm’s rate of growth. Oxford Economic Papers 16: 9–23.
Rubin, P.H. 1973. The expansion of firms. Journal of Political Economy 81: 936–949.
Shane, S.A. 1996. Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors. Academy of Management Journal 39: 216–234.
Shen, T.Y. 1970. Economies of scale, Penrose-effect, growth of plants and their size distribution. Journal of Political Economy 78: 702–716.
Slater, M. 1980. The managerial limitations to a firm’s rate of growth. Economic Journal 90: 520–528.
Tan, D. 2003. The limits to the growth of multinational firms in a foreign market. Managerial and Decision Economics 24: 569–582.
Tan, D. 2009. Foreign market entry strategies and post-entry growth: Acquisitions vs. greenfield investments. Journal of International Business Studies 40: 1046–1063.
Tan, D., and J.T. Mahoney. 2005. Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics 26: 113–127.
Tan, D., and J.T. Mahoney. 2007. The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries: The Penrose effect. Management International Review 47: 259–279.
Thompson, R.S. 1994. The franchise life cycle and the Penrose effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 24: 207–218.
Treadway, A.B.. 1970. Adjustment costs and variable inputs in the theory of the competitive firm. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 329–347.
Uzawa, H. 1969. Time preference and the Penrose effect in a two-class model of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 77: 628–652.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tan, D. (2016). Penrose Effect, the. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_647-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_647-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences