The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management

Living Edition
| Editors: Mie Augier, David J. Teece

Pre-emption and Entry Timing

  • Xavier Martin
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_590-1

Abstract

Entry timing research examines how firm performance varies, possibly non-monotonically, with the order (also known as order of entry) or elapsed time since first entry into a new market. While the pre-emption literature in economics focuses on assumptions for a first entrant to monopolize a market, contemporary strategy scholarship emphasizes more subtle and contingent entry timing effects – with recognition of the importance of endogenous firm characteristics (e.g., complementary assets) and choices (e.g., modes of expansion or entry), and industry contingencies (e.g., knowledge tacitness). Groundbreaking applications of entry timing concepts pertain to international management as well as innovation contexts.

Keywords

Switching Cost Intellectual Capital Entry Timing Complementary Asset International Business Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., M.B. Sarkar, and R. Echambadi. 2002. The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach. Academy of Management Journal 45: 971–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi, J. 1996. Preemptive R&D, rent dissipation, and the leverage theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 1153–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gilbert, R.J., and D.M.G. Newbery. 1982. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review 72: 514–526.Google Scholar
  4. Katz, M.L., and C. Shapiro. 1987. R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation. American Economic Review 77: 402–420.Google Scholar
  5. Lieberman, M.B., and D.B. Montgomery. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal 9: 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lieberman, M.B., and D.B. Montgomery. 1998. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 19: 1111–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Makadok, R. 1998. Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal 19: 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin, X., A. Swaminathan, and W. Mitchell. 1998. Organizational evolution in an interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 566–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, X., A. Swaminathan, and L. Tihanyi. 2007. Modeling international expansion. In Research methodology in strategy and management, vol. 4, ed. D.J. Ketchen and D.D. Bergh. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Mascarenhas, B. 1992. Order of entry and performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal 13: 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell, W. 1989. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging medical subfields. Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 208–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitchell, W., J.M. Shaver, and B. Yeung. 1994. Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal 15: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ofek, E., and M. Sarvary. 2003. R&D, marketing, and the success of next generation products. Marketing Science 22: 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reinganum, J.F. 1989. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. In Handbook of industrial organization, vol. 1, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, W.T., G. Kalyanaram, and G.L. Urban. 1994. First mover advantages from pioneering new markets: A survey of empirical evidence. Review of Industrial Organization 9: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salomon, R., and X. Martin. 2008. Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Science 54: 1266–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suarez, F., and G. Lanzolla. 2007. The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review 32: 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zander, U., and B. Kogut. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science 6: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CentERTilburgThe Netherlands