The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management

Living Edition
| Editors: Mie Augier, David J. Teece

Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_562-1

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate method for a given research question is an essential skill for organizational researchers. High-quality research involves a good fit between the methods used and the nature of the contribution to the literature. This article describes a contingency framework that relates the state of prior theory and research to the design of a current research project, paying particular attention to when to mix qualitative and quantitative data. Whereas contributions to mature literatures are best made with quantitative methods, and contribute to nascent literature’s call for qualitative data, intermediate research is best served by a mix of both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Barker, J.R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 408–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barley, S.R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouchard Jr., T.J. 1976. Field research methods: Interviewing, questionnaires, participant observation, systematic observation, unobtrusive measures. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, ed. M.D. Dunnette. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, J.P., R.L. Daft, and C.L. Hulin. 1982. What to study: Generating and developing research questions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Edmondson, A.C. 1996. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edmondson, A.C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmondson, A.C., and S.E. McManus. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review 32: 1155–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmondson, A.C., R.M. Bohmer, and G.P. Pisano. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 685–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32: 543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Hackman, J.R. 1987. The design of work teams. In Handbook of organizational behavior, ed. J. Lorsch. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Ibarra, H. 1999. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 764–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jick, T.D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellogg, K.C. 2009. Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology 115: 657–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, T.W., T.R. Mitchell, and C.J. Sablynski. 1999. Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior 55: 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McGrath, J.E. 1964. Toward a ‘theory of method’ for research on organizations. In New perspectives in organization research, ed. W.W. Cooper, H.J. Leavitt, and M.W. Shelly II. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Mohr, L.B. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Van Maanen, J. 1975. Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yauch, C.A., and H.J. Steudel. 2003. Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research Methods 6: 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Business SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA