Skip to main content

Demand for Innovation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

Innovation research from the demand side is bringing a new focus to the innovation literature; rather than examining only internal technology strategy factors to study innovation, demand for innovation research incorporates customers’ demand as another factor driving firm innovation. We review recent developments from research on demand-side approaches to technology innovation. We organize our comments along two key questions: (1) How does consumer demand contribute to firms’ value creation? and (2) What are the implications of heterogeneous consumer demand for firms’ innovation strategies? We hope this new theoretical approach will combine with technology-driven work to improve our understanding of innovation processes.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adner, R. 2004. A demand-based perspective on technology life cycles. In Business strategy over the industry lifecycle: Advances in strategic management, vol. 21, ed. J. Baum and A. McGahan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., and D. Levinthal. 2001. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science 47: 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., and D. Snow. 2010. Old technology responses to new technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Industrial and Corporate Change 19: 1655–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C., and von E. Hippel. 2010. Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Working paper No. 4764–09. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M., and M. Tripsas. 2012. The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal 33: 277–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., A. Afuah, and B. Bastian. 2010. Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management 36: 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2008. Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal 28: 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, G., A. Gambardella, and G. Verona. 2009. A demand-based view of technological innovation: A review, conceptualization, and future research directions. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, P., and J. Runde. 2009. On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review 34: 442–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J., K. Laursen, and T. Pedersen. 2011. Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science 22: 980–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. 1974. The Economics of industrial innovation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., I. MacMillan, and J. Thompson. 2008. Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science 54: 1652–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., I. MacMillan, and J. Thompson. 2012. From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. Journal of Management 38: 1421–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, R. A. 2008. Heterogeneity among survivors of a competence-destroying technological discontinuity. Best paper proceedings of the annual meeting of the academy of management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S.K., and M. Tripsas. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1: 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., and S. Shah. 2010. Knowledge transfer between user and established firms: CVC investment and physician-entrepreneurs in the medical device industry. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. 2008. Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Managerial and Decision Economics 29: 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy 5: 212–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., and E. von Hippel. 2006. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science 52: 975–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Priem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Priem, R., Li, S. (2016). Demand for Innovation. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_342-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_342-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics