Skip to main content

Markets as Networks

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

We discuss existing research that applies a relational, socio-structural lens to studying organizations and markets. Research in this field has described markets first and foremost as networks of enduring relationships and repeated interactions among organizations. We start by addressing some of the key findings of extant research regarding the antecedents of network structures and variations in their emergent structural properties. We then evaluate the implications of these network structures for a range of organizational behaviours and outcomes, exploring the underlying mechanisms for the effects of networks.

Keywords

  • Private Information
  • Small World
  • Organizational Outcome
  • Network Position
  • Dyadic Relationship

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 425–455.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E. 1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J., and M. Gargiulo. 2004. Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Academy of Management Journal 47: 843–859.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.E. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96: 589–625.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.E., R.R. Faulkner, and G. Fisher. 1998. Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. American Sociological Review 63: 147–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J.A.C., T. Calabrese, and B.S. Silverman. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21: 267–294.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J.A.C., A.V. Shipilov, and T. Rowley. 2003. Where do small worlds come from? Industrial and Corporate Change 12: 697–725.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J.A.C., T.J. Rowley, A.V. Shipilov, and Y.-T. Chuang. 2005. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 536–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J.A.C., B. McEvily, and T. Rowley. 2012. Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organization Science 23: 529–546.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C.M., and P.R. Haunschild. 2002. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 92–124.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 2008. Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: 953–969.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., and M.J. Piskorski. 2005. Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: Resource dependence theory revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., H. Singh, and K. Lee. 2000. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 583–613.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F., and H.R. Greve. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology 103: 1–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F., M. Yoo, and W.E. Baker. 2003. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organization 1: 301–326.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27: 31–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R.M., and R.V. Gould. 1994. A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1455–1491.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., W. Bielefeld, and M. Dowell. 2006. Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Administrative Science Quarterly 51: 337–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H.R. 2009. Bigger and safer: The diffusion of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 30: 1–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H.R., J.A.C. Baum, H. Mitsuhashi, and T. Rowley. 2010. Built to last but falling apart: Cohesion, friction and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy of Management Journal 53: 302–322.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1995a. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38: 85–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1995b. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619–652.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 2007. Managing network resources: Alliances, affiliations, and other relational assets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and M. Gargiulo. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104: 1439–1493.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and M.C. Higgins. 2003. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal 24: 127–144.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and M. Sytch. 2007. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on exchange performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 52: 32–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and M. Sytch. 2008. Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust. Managerial and Decision Economics 29: 165–190.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and J.D. Westphal. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 473–506.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., D. Lavie, and R. Madhavan. 2011. How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior 31: 207–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., M. Sytch, and A. Tatarynowicz. 2012. The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of social structure. Organization Science 23: 449–471.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., and M. Aiken. 1967. Program change and organizational properties: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology 72: 503–519.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, P.R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 564–592.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, P.R., and C. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 815–844.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. 2003. The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 466–497.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. 2008. The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do social status and structural holes work against you? Academy of Management Journal 51: 723–743.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.W., and M.C. Higgins. 2007. Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy 36: 499–514.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., R.E. Hoskisson, and W.P. Wan. 2004. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal 25: 613–636.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., and G. Walker. 2001. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review 66: 317–335.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76–104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review 31: 638–658.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A., and M. Fichman. 1988. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor–client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 345–369.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.X., and T.J. Rowley. 2002. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Academy of Management Journal 45: 1104–1118.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.M., M.L. Gerlach, and P. Takahashi. 1992. Keiretsu networks in the Japanese economy: A dyad analysis of intercorporate ties. American Sociological Review 57: 561–585.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., B.R. Koka, and J.E. Prescott. 1998. Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal 19: 439–459.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., and A. Marcus. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 26: 1033–1055.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., and A. Zaheer. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20: 1133–1156.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., J. Jaffee, and M. Tortoriello. 2012. Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry 1933–1978. Organization Science 23: 547–563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M.S. 1992. The structure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and their consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., and W.W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science 15: 5–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, S. 2007. Social balance sheet, social capital and reciprocation in the US VC industry. Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Philadelphia. 6 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and P. Nowak. 1976. Joint-ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 398–418.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology 98: 829–872.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 458–483.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. 2008. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polidoro, F., G. Ahuja, and W. Mitchell. 2011. When the social structure overshadows competing incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal 54: 369–392.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., D.R. White, K.W. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1132–1205.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., and E. Zuckerman. 2008. Why knowledge does not equal power: The network redundancy trade-off. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: 904–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., and G. Padula. 2008. Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organization Science 19: 669–687.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., and M. Tushman. 1998. The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 7: 311–346.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., D. Behrens, and D. Krackhardt. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal 21: 369–386.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M.D., and O. Sorenson. 2007. Brokers and competitive advantage. Management Science 53: 566–583.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M., and C.C. Phelps. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53: 1113–1126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shipilov, A. 2006. Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Academy of Management Journal 49: 590–604.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shipilov, A.V., and S.X. Li. 2008. To have a cake and eat it too? Structural holes’ influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 73–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., and T.E. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106: 1546–1588.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., and D.M. Waguespack. 2006. Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Administrative Science Quarterly 51: 560–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal 21: 791–811.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E., H. Hoang, and R.C. Hybels. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 215–252.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sytch, M. 2010. Where do conflictual ties come from? Exploring the role of spatial distribution of principals and mediating agents. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual conference, Montreal, 9 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytch, M., and A. Tatarynowicz. 2013. Friends and foes: The dynamics of dual social structures. Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytch, M., A. Tatarynowicz, and R. Gulati. 2012. Toward a theory of extended contact: Incentives and opportunities for bridging across network communities. Organization Science 23: 1658–1681.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tatarynowicz, A., R. Gulati, and M. Sytch. 2013. Individual behaviors and collective outcomes: Capturing the structural and functional variety of collaborative networks across industries. Working paper, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., and J. Spiro. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology 111: 447–504.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., and E.J. Zajac. 2007. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1291–1317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D.J., and S.H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393: 440–442.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D., R. Gulati, and S.M. Shortell. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 366–394.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., and G.G. Bell. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal 26: 809–825.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., and G. Soda. 2009. Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly 54: 1–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., E. Hernandez, and S. Banerjee. 2010. Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organization Science 21: 1072–1091.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Sytch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Sytch, M., Gulati, R. (2016). Markets as Networks. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_321-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_321-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences