Skip to main content

Radical and Incremental Technical Change

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Inspired by Schumpeter, researchers studying the influences of technical change on industries and firms have sought to classify types of technical change according to how dramatic the shift is in the technology underlying products in an industry. Such technical changes have been commonly classified as either radical or incremental. Radical technical change is a discontinuous shift in the base of scientific or technical knowledge underlying the products in an industry or product class, whereas incremental technical change is continuous refinement along an existing technological trajectory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W.J., and J.M. Utterback. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80: 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., and M.L. Tushman. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 604–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M.J. 2007. The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Academy of Management Review 32: 703–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M.J. 2010. Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organization Science 21: 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M.J., and M. Tushman. 2003. Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28: 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M., and J.L. Bower. 1996. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17: 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., and C. Smith. 1992. How established firms respond to threatening technologies. Academy of Management Executive 6: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11: 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J.E., W.P. Bridges, and R.D. O’Keefe. 1984. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science 30: 682–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. 1986. Innovation: The attacker’s advantage. New York: Summit Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., M. Tushman, W. Smith, and P. Anderson. 2002. A structural approach to assessing innovation. Management Science 48: 1103–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C.G. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48: 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., M. Gavin, and L. Smith. 1995. Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42: 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. 1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 24: 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R.M., and K.B. Clark. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. 1983. Revolution in time: Clocks and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. 1997a. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal 18: 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. 1997b. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability. Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 341–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.L., and P. Anderson. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary J. Benner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Benner, M.J. (2018). Radical and Incremental Technical Change. In: Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_703

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics