Skip to main content

Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate method for a given research question is an essential skill for organizational researchers. High-quality research involves a good fit between the methods used and the nature of the contribution to the literature. This article describes a contingency framework that relates the state of prior theory and research to the design of a current research project, paying particular attention to when to mix qualitative and quantitative data. Whereas contributions to mature literatures are best made with quantitative methods, and contribute to nascent literature’s call for qualitative data, intermediate research is best served by a mix of both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barker, J.R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 408–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard Jr., T.J. 1976. Field research methods: Interviewing, questionnaires, participant observation, systematic observation, unobtrusive measures. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, ed. M.D. Dunnette. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P., R.L. Daft, and C.L. Hulin. 1982. What to study: Generating and developing research questions. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A.C. 1996. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32: 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A.C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A.C., and S.E. McManus. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review 32: 1155–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A.C., R.M. Bohmer, and G.P. Pisano. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32: 543–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R. 1987. The design of work teams. In Handbook of organizational behavior, ed. J. Lorsch. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. 1999. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 764–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T.D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K.C. 2009. Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology 115: 657–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.W., T.R. Mitchell, and C.J. Sablynski. 1999. Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior 55: 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.E. 1964. Toward a ‘theory of method’ for research on organizations. In New perspectives in organization research, ed. W.W. Cooper, H.J. Leavitt, and M.W. Shelly II. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L.B. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. 1975. Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yauch, C.A., and H.J. Steudel. 2003. Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research Methods 6: 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy C. Edmondson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Edmondson, A.C., Zuzul, T. (2018). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. In: Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_562

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics