At the Outer Limits of Knowledge
We are defined by science. No matter if we are mystified by equations or never get to shake a test tube, we all function in a scientific framework that determines the way we think and act.
This is a recent phenomenon. For most of history the boundaries of Western inquiry and creativity have been set by religion. Without subscribing to the fable that science and religion are necessarily in conflict (many, if not most, of the great scientific discoveries have been set firmly in the Christian or, at least, the deistic tradition), it is nonetheless true that in matters of dispute, the clerics commanded the high ground.
The kick-start to a long process of change came with the Enlightenment when the brotherhood of sceptics—Voltaire, Hume, Kant among them—questioned the need for divine intercession of any kind, at any time. It was not long before the challenge was put to the test. The evolutionary theories that took hold of the nineteenth century imagination were deployed by Darwin’s...
- Dennis Sewell, The Political Gene, p. 32Google Scholar
- Rónán McDonald, The Death of the Critic, p. 117Google Scholar
- James Wood, The New Yorker, 31.8.09Google Scholar
- Marilynne Robinson, Absence of Mind, p. 29Google Scholar
- David Papineau in Philosophy Bites ed. by David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton, p. 109Google Scholar
- Brian Ellis in The Philosophy of Science ed. by David Papineau, p. 168Google Scholar
- William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 89Google Scholar