The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Palgrave Macmillan

Hegelianism

  • R. P. Bellamy
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_722-1
How to cite

Abstract

The origins and concerns of the political ideas of the German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel (1770–1831) are traditionally thought to be religious rather than economic. However, a preoccupation with issues of political economy is present in his earliest theological writings and lies at the centre of his wider philosophical project (Hegel 1793–1800). Broadly speaking, Hegel wished to construct an ethical theory appropriate for the specific problems of the modern world. He believed ancient and medieval societies had been bound together by a communal code of behaviour, with social roles mirroring a putative natural or divine order. The harmony of the natural macrocosm and the social microcosm had been sundered in modern societies by a growing awareness of individuality on the part of their members. Hegel traced this development to two sources: the primacy accorded to the individual conscience within Christianity, especially the Lutheranism he personally espoused, and the individualism encouraged by the capitalist mode of production. Contrary to recent influential critics (e.g. Popper 1945), Hegel did not wish to stifle individual liberty by returning to the organic community theorized by Plato. Instead, he sought to describe the conditions necessary for the freedom of each person to be compatible with the freedom of all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Avinieri, S. 1972. Hegel’s theory of the modern state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bosanquet, B. 1899. The philosophical theory of the state. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Chamley, P. 1963. Economie politique et philosophie chez Steuart et Hegel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Gentile, G. 1946. Genesis and structure of society. Trans H.S. Harris. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. Green, T.H. (1878–80). Lectures on the principles of political obligation, ed. Paul Harris and John Morrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, G.W.F. 1793–1800. Early theological writings. Trans. T.M. Knox. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  7. Hegel, G.W.F. 1807. The phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, G.W.F. 1817–19. Die Philosophie des Rechts: Die Mitschriften Wannenman (Heidelberge 1817/18) und Homeyer (Berlin 1818/19), ed. K.-H. Itling. Stuttgart: Keltt-Cotta, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. Hegel, G.W.F. 1818–31. Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, 1818–31, 4 vols, ed. K.-H. Itling. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973–4.Google Scholar
  10. Hegel, G.W.F. 1821. Philosophy of right. Trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, G.W.F. 1822–30. Lectures on the philosophy of world history: Introduction. Trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Marx, K. 1843. Critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right. Trans. J. O’Malley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Pelczynski, Z.A. (ed.). 1984. The state and civil society: Studies in Hegel’s political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Plant, R. 1977. Hegel and political economy. New Left Review 103: 79–92; 104: 103–113.Google Scholar
  15. Popper, K. 1945. The open society and its enemies, vol. 2. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Vincent, A., and R. Plant. 1984. Philosophy, politics and citizenship: The life and thought of the British idealists. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. Bellamy
    • 1
  1. 1.