Skip to main content

Pricing on the Internet

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

While many conjectured that the information-rich and frictionless nature of online markets would result in marginal cost pricing, this has proved not to be the case. Price dispersion online is ubiquitous. The main reason is that price discovery occurs through platforms that have an incentive to ensure that prices are dispersed so that information is valuable. We survey models of platform pricing and trace the impact of their decisions downstream to e-retailers. Finally, we highlight the connection between empirical findings and theory predictions for e-retail pricing.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online edition, 2013. Edited by Palgrave Macmillan

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Armstrong, M. 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics 37(3): 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., and J. Wright. 2007. Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory 32(2): 353–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M.R., and J. Morgan. 2001. Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. American Economic Review 91(3): 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M.R., J. Morgan, and P. Scholten. 2004. Price dispersion in the small and large: evidence from an internet price comparison site. Journal of Industrial Economics 52(4): 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M.R., J. Rupert, J. Gatti, P. Kattuman, and J. Morgan. 2009. Clicks, discontinuities, and firm demand online. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18(4): 935–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M.R., X. Gao, and J. Morgan. 2011. On the optimality of clickthrough fees in online markets. Economic Journal 121(556): 340–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, W., and A.F. Tieman. 2008. Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26(5): 1250–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., and J. Morgan. 2009. How much is a dollar worth? Tipping versus equilibrium coexistence on competing online auction sites. Journal of Political Economy 117(4): 668–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., T. Hossain, and J. Morgan. 2010. Shrouded attributes and information suppression: Evidence from field experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(2): 859–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., and M.D. Smith. 2000. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Science 46(4): 563–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., M.D. Smith, and Y. Hu. 2003. Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Science 49(11): 1580–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butters, G.R. 1977. Equilibrium distributions of sales and advertising prices. Review of Economic Studies 44: 465–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud, B., and B. Jullien. 2003. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics 34(2): 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. 2008. Backward integrated information gatekeepers and independent divisions in the product market.B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1), Article 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J., and A. Goolsbee. 2003. Measuring prices and price competition online: Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 1: 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, B., M. Ostrowsky, and M. Schwarz. 2007. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97(1): 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., and S.F. Ellison. 2009. Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the internet. Econometrica 77(2): 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., and D. Fudenberg. 2003. Knife-edge or plateau: When do market models tip? Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4): 1249–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., D. Fudenberg, and M. Möbius. 2004. Competing auctions. Journal of the European Economic Association 2(1): 30–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X., and D. Laibson. 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 505–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, T., and J. Morgan. 2006. …Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 6(2), Article 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, T., D. Minor, and J. Morgan. 2011. Competing matchmakers: An experimental analysis. Management Science 57(11): 1913–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G., D. Soberman, and J.M. Villas-Boas. 2005. The targeting of advertising. Marketing Science 24(3): 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. D. 2011. The economics of internet markets. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 16852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, C. 1988. Competitive promotional strategies. Journal of Business 61(4): 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., and J. Tirole. 2003. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4): 990–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., and J. Tirole. 2006. Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics 37(3): 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R.W. 1980. A model in which an increase in the number of sellers leads to a higher price. Econometrica 48(6): 1575–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilony, Y. 1977. Mixed pricing in oligopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, D. 1995. Bertrand competition when rivals’ costs are unknown. Journal of Industrial Economics 43(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. 1961. The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy 69(3): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G.J., E. Yin, and R. Niraj. 2009. Does quality win: Network effects versus quality in high tech markets. Journal of Marketing Research 46(2): 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. 1980. A model of sales. American Economic Review 70(4): 651–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. 2007. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25(6): 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16: 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, E.G. 2010. A price theory of multi-sided platforms. American Economic Review 100(4): 1642–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Baye, M.R., Morgan, J. (2013). Pricing on the Internet. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2856-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2856-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics