Cognitive Ability
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2810-1
Abstract
Modern psychological theory views cognitive ability as multidimensional while acknowledging that the many different abilities are themselves positively correlated. This positive correlation across abilities has led most psychometricians to accept the reality of a general cognitive ability that is reflected in the full scale score on major tests of cognitive ability or IQ. This article provides an introduction to the history of cognitive testing and some of its major controversies. Evidence supporting the validity of measures of cognitive ability is presented and the nature and implications of group differences are discussed along with evidence on its malleability.
Keywords
Ability tests Achievement tests Cognitive ability Cultural bias External validity Factor analysis Heritability IQ Intelligence Stereotype threatJEL Classifications
D1This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bibliography
- Asbury, K., T. Wachs, and R. Plomin. 2005. Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence 33: 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Binet, A. 1905. New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. L’Année Psychologique 12, 191–244. English edition: 1916. The Development of Intelligence in Children (trans: Elizabeth S. Kite). Vineland: Publications of the Training School at Vineland.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. 1960. Measuring intelligence with culture fair tests. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
- Ceci, S. 1991. How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology 27: 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dickens, W. 2005. Genetic differences and school readiness. The Future of Children 15: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dickens, W., and J. Flynn. 2001. Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review 108: 346–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dickens, W., and J. Flynn. 2006. Black Americans reduce the racial IQ gap: Evidence from standardization samples. Psychological Science 17: 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flynn, J. 1987. Massive gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin 101: 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flynn, J. 1998. IQ gains over time: toward finding the causes. In The rising curve long-term gains in IQ and related measures, ed. U. Neisser. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Flynn, J. 2006. Efeito Flynn: repensando a inteligência e seus efeitos [The Flynn effect: rethinking intelligence and what affects it]. In Introdução à Psicologia das Diferenças Individuais [Introduction to the psychology of individual differences], ed. C. Flores-Mendoza and R. Colom. Porto Alegre: ArtMed.Google Scholar
- Heckman, J. 1995. Lessons from the bell curve. Journal of Political Economy 103: 1091–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herrnstein, R., and C. Murray. 1994. The Bell Curve. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Jensen, A. 1973. Educability and group differences. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Jensen, A. 1998. The g factor: The science of Mental Ability. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Johnson, C., and S. Bradley-Johnson. 2002. Construct stability of the cognitive abilities scale-second edition for infants and toddlers. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 20: 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lazar, I., and R. Darlington. 1982. Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. In Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 47. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Neisser, U., G. Boodoo, T. Bouchard Jr., A. Boykin, N. Brody, S. Ceci, D. Halpern, J. Loehlin, R. Perloff, R. Sternberg, and S. Urbina. 1996. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist 51: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plomin, R., J. Defries, G. McClearn, and P. McGuffin. 2001. Behavioral genetics. 4th edn. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
- Plomin, R., N. Pedersen, P. Lichtenstein, and G. McClearn. 1994. Variability and stability in cognitive abilities are largely genetic later in life. Behavior Genetics 24: 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raven, J. 1941. Standardization of progressive matrices. British Journal of Medical Psychology 19: 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ree, M., and J. Earles. 1992. Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1: 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ree, M., J. Earles, and M. Teachout. 1994. Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rushton, J., and A. Jensen. 2005. Thirty years of research on race differences incognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 11: 235–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spearman, C. 1904. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15: 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steele, C. 1997. A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52: 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thurstone, L. 1935. The vectors of the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Turkheimer, E., A. Haley, M. Waldron, B. D’Onofrio, and I. Gottesman. 2003. Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science 14: 623–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© The Author(s) 2008