Skip to main content

Difference-in-Difference Estimators

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

This article discusses difference-in-differences (DID) estimators, which are commonly applied in evaluation research. In particular, the discussion focuses on (a) motivation, definition and interpretation of DID estimators, (b) conditions under which DID estimators are valid, (c) data requirements to compute DID estimators, (d) representative applications of DID estimators in the empirical economics literature, (e) extensions of DID estimators, and (f) a simple indirect test to assess the validity of these estimators.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abadie, A. 2005. Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies 72: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J.D., and A.B.. Krueger. 1999. Empirical strategies in labor economics. In Handbook of labor economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., and D. Card. 1985. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey, S.C., and G.W. Imbens. 2006. Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-difference models. Econometrica 74: 431–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., and T. MaCurdy. 1999. Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In Handbook of labor economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. 1990. The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44: 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., and A.B.. Krueger. 1994. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review 84: 772–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, G.T., and G. Hanka. 1999. Capital structure and corporate control: The effect of antitakeover statutes on firm leverage. Journal of Finance 54: 519–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., and J. Poterba. 1994. Tax incentives and the decision to purchase health insurance: Evidence from the self-employed. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 701–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J., H. Ichimura, and P.E. Todd. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies 64: 605–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D. 1995. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D., W.K. Viscusi, and D.L. Durbin. 1995. Workers’ compensation and injury duration: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Economic Review 85: 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Abadie, A. (2008). Difference-in-Difference Estimators. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2593-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2593-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics