Skip to main content

Social Multipliers

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Social multipliers can be thought of as indicators of the degree of strategic complementarity among interacting agents. A simple choice model is used to derive a formal expression of the social multiplier. The behaviour of the multiplier is described in relation to various factors, such as the strength of complementarity and topology of social interactions. Social multipliers are shown to help explain behaviours, such as criminal activity and labour participation, which vary greatly across social groups or across time out of proportion to variation in fundamentals. Challenges associated with identification of social multipliers are also discussed.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G., J.L. Yellen, and M. Katz. 1996. An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 277–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono, P., G. Foster, N. Goodpaster, and J. Kinsler. 2005. Estimating spillovers in the classroom with panel data. Mimeo: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G., and K.M. Murphy. 2000. Social economics: Market behavior in a social environment. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.M. 2002. Locally interdependent preferences in a general equilibrium environment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47: 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., and M.H. Pesaran. 2001. Life-cycle consumption under social interactions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25: 35–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin, A., U. Horst, and O. Ozgur. 2006. Rational expectations equilibria of economies with local interactions. Journal of Economic Theory 127: 74–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L.E., and S. Durlauf. 2003. The interactions-based approach to socioeconomic behavior. In Social dynamics, ed. S. Durlauf and H.P. Young. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2001. Interactions based models. In Handbook of econometrics, ed. J. Heckman and E. Leamer, vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2007. Identification of binary choice models with social interactions. Journal of Econometrics 140: 52–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M.A., G. Fournier, and K. Prasad. 2006. The emergence of local norms in networks. Complexity 11: 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M.A., and F. Heiland. 2007. Social dynamics of obesity. Economic Inquiry 45: 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cole, E. 2006. Multiple groups identification in the linear-in-means mode. Economics Letters 92: 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., and A. John. 1988. Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research 103: 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., B. Sacerdote, and J. Scheinkman. 1996. Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., B. Sacerdote, and J. Scheinkman. 2003. The social multiplier. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., and J. Scheinkman. 2003. Non-market interactions. In Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications, eighth world congress, ed. M. Dewatripont, L.P. Hansen, and S. Turnovsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., and L. Katz. 2002. The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy 110: 730–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B. 2006. Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B., and J. Hahn. 2005. Identification and estimation of the linear-in-means model of social interactions. Economics Letters 88: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., J. Kubik, and J. Stein. 2004. Social interaction and stock-market participation. Journal of Finance 59: 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C., and G. Weingarth. 2006. Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Mimeo: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichino, A., and A. Falk. 2006. Clean evidence on peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics 24: 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, Y. 2006. Topologies of social interactions. Economic Theory 28: 559–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, Y., and J.E. Zabel. 2003. Neighborhood effects and housing demand. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60: 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topa, G. 2001. Social interactions, local spillovers, and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 68: 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Burke, M.A. (2008). Social Multipliers. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2310-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2310-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics