Precautionary Saving and Precautionary Wealth
Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2079-1
Abstract
Precautionary saving measures the consequences of uncertainty for the rate of change (and therefore the level) of wealth. The qualitative aspects of precautionary saving theory are now well established: an increase in uncertainty will increase the level of saving, but will reduce the marginal propensity to save. Quantitatively, theory combined with empirical estimates of risk aversion suggests that precautionary saving and precautionary wealth should be quite large. More direct empirical evidence on precautionary saving suggests that precautionary effects on saving are substantial, but the magnitude of the effects is disputed, and the different estimates are not all expressed in comparable units.
Keywords
Calibration Consumption function Elasticity of intertemporal substitution Euler equations Impatience Liquidity constraints Perfect foresight Precautionary saving Precautionary savings Precautionary wealth Preferences Risk aversion Time consistency UncertaintyJEL Classifications
D4 D10This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bibliography
- Barsky, R.B., N. Gregory Mankiw, and S.P. Zeldes. 1986. Ricardian consumers with Keynesian propensities. American Economic Review 76: 676–691.Google Scholar
- Browning, M.J., and A. Lusardi. 1996. Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1797–1855.Google Scholar
- Cagetti, M. 2003. Wealth accumulation over the life cycle and precautionary savings. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21: 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carroll, C.D. 2000. Solving consumption models with multiplicative habits. Economics Letters 68: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carroll, C.D. 2001. Death to the log-linearized consumption Euler equation! (and very poor health to the second-order approximation). Advances in Macroeconomics 1, Article 6.Google Scholar
- Carroll, C.D. 2004. Theoretical foundations of buffer stock saving. Working paper no. 10867. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
- Carroll, C.D. and M. S. Kimball. 2005. Liquidity constraints and precautionary saving. Manuscript, Johns Hopkins University. Online. Availeable at: http://econ.jhu.edu/ccarroll/liquidRevised.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2007.
- Carroll, C.D., and A.A. Samwick. 1997. The nature of precautionary wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics 40: 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carroll, C.D., and A.A. Samwick. 1998. How important is precautionary saving? The Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Drèze, J.H., and F. Modigliani. 1972. Consumption decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 5: 308–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dynan, K.E. 1993. How prudent are consumers? Journal of Political Economy 101: 1104–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engen, E., and J. Gruber. 2001. Unemployment insurance and precautionary saving. Journal of Monetary Economics 47: 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs-Schündeln, N., and M. Schündeln. 2005. Precautionary savings and selfselection: Evidence from the German reunification ‘experiment’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 1085–1220.Google Scholar
- Gourinchas, P.-O., and J. Parker. 2002. Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica 70: 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guiso, L., T. Jappelli, and D. Terlizzese. 1992. Earnings uncertainty and precautionary saving. Journal of Monetary Economics 302: 307–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huggett, M. 2004. Precautionary wealth accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 71: 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hurst, E., A. Lusardi, A. Kennickell and F. Torralba. 2005. Precautionary savings and the importance of business owners. NBER working paper no. 11731.Google Scholar
- Kazarosian, M. 1997. Precautionary savings – a panel study. The Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennickell, A. and A. Lusardi 2005. Disentangling the importance of the precautionary saving motive. Working paper, Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
- Kimball, M.S. 1990. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kimball, M.S., C.R. Sahm, and M.D. Shapiro. 2005. Imputing risk tolerance from survey responses. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Kimball, M.S., and P. Weil. 2004. Precautionary saving and consumption smoothing across time and possibilities. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Kreps, D.M., and E.L. Porteus. 1978. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laibson, D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leland, H.E. 1968. Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82: 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Low, H., C. Meghir, and L. Pistaferri. 2005. Wage risk and employment over the life cycle. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Lusardi, A. 1997. Precautionary saving and subjective earnings variance. Economics Letters 57: 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lusardi, A. 1998. On the importance of the precautionary saving motive. American Economic Review 88: 449–453.Google Scholar
- Miller, B.L. 1976. The effect on optimal consumption of increased uncertainty in labor income in the multiperiod case. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palumbo, M.G. 1999. Uncertain medical expenses and precautionary saving near the end of the life cycle. Review of Economic Studies 66: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sibley, D.S. 1975. Permanent and transitory effects of optimal consumption with wage income uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 11: 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toché, P. 2005. A tractable model of precautionary saving in continuous time. Economics Letters 87: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeldes, S.P. 1989. Optimal consumption with stochastic income: Deviations from certainty equivalence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© The Author(s) 2008