Family Relations in Times of Austerity: Reflections from the UK

  • Sarah Marie Hall
Living reference work entry
Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 5)


This chapter examines the ways in which family relationships and everyday practices may be open to change and contestation in times of austerity. While an extant body of literature explores changing familial relations as a result of social and cultural transformations, there remain pertinent questions concerning how such intimate relationships are impacted by economic upheaval. This issue is particularly timely, given the widespread impacts of austerity policies in the UK and across Europe currently. Drawing on insights from literature and supported by family ethnographies in the UK, this chapter sheds light on this very topic. Using the examples of austeritizing welfare and austere consumption, it brings to the fore the inseparability of familial and financial relations, everyday life, and economic change. The conclusion calls for further research into the social geographies of austerity, to extend beyond families and households to include friendships, intimacies, and acquaintanceships.


Family Austerity Intimate relations Financial crisis Ethnography Consumption Welfare 


  1. Aitken, S. C. (2000). Fathering and faltering: “Sorry, but you don’t have the necessary accoutrements”. Environment & Planning A, 32(4), 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, S. (2011). Friendship, co-presence and care: Neglected spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(6), 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. (2015). Marriage and the spare bedroom tax: Exploring the sexual politics of austerity in Britain. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), 975–988.Google Scholar
  5. Department for Work and Pensions. (2014). Local authorities and advisers: Removal of the spare room subsidy. Accessed 19 Oct 2015.
  6. Department for Work and Pensions. (2015). Policy area: Welfare. Accessed 10 Oct 2015.
  7. Dermott, E., & Seymour, J. (2011). Displaying families: A new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2003). Motherhood, paid work and partnering: Values and theories. Work, Employment & Society, 17(2), 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2012). Farewell to family? Notes on an argument for retaining the concept. Families, Relationships & Societies, 1(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, R., & Irwin, S. (2010). Lived experience through economic downturn in Britain- perspectives across time and across the life-course. Twenty-First Century Society, 5(2), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. England, K. (2010). Home, work and the shifting geographies of care. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, R. (2014). Parental death as a vital conjuncture? Intergenerational care and responsibility following bereavement in Senegal. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(5), 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillis, J. R. (1996). A world of their own making: Myth, ritual, and the quest for family values. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Goode, J. (2009). For love or money? Couples’ negotiations of credit and debt in low-income families in the UK. Benefits, 17(3), 213–224.Google Scholar
  17. GOV.UK. (2015a). Universal credit: How to claim. Benefits. Accessed 3 Nov 2015.
  18. GOV.UK. (2015b). Married couple’s allowance. Income Tax. Accessed 12 Oct 2015.
  19. Graham-Leigh, E. (2015). A diet of austerity: Class, food and climate change. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, S. M. (2011). Exploring the “ethical everyday”: An ethnography of the ethics of family consumption. Geoforum, 42(6), 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, S. M. (2015). Everyday ethics of consumption in the Austere City. Geography Compass, 9(3), 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, S. M. (2016a). Everyday family experiences of the financial crisis: Getting by in the recent economic recession. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(2), 305–330.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, S. M. (2016b). Personal, relational and intimate geographies of austerity: Ethical and empirical considerations. Area. doi:10.1111/area.12251.Google Scholar
  24. Harker, C., & Martin, L. L. (2012). Familial relations: Spaces, subject, and politics. Environment & Planning A, 44(4), 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, E. (2013). Bouncing back? Recession, resilience and everyday lives. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heath, S., & Calvert, E. (2013). Gifts, loans and intergenerational support for young adults. Sociology, 47(6), 1120–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henwood, K., Shirani, F., & Coltart, C. (2010). Fathers and financial risk-taking during the economic downturn: Insights from a QLL study of men’s identities-in-the-making. Twenty-First Century Society, 5(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinton, E., & Goodman, M. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Developments, considerations and new directions. In M. R. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 245–261). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. HM Treasury. (2015). Policy paper: Summer budget 2015. publications/summer-budget-2015/summer-budget-2015. Accessed 13 July 2015.
  30. HM Treasury. (2012). Budget 2012. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
  31. Holdsworth, C. (2013). Family and intimate mobilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, P. (2009). Introduction: Food as a lens on family life. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Changing families, changing food (pp. 1–16). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen, T., & Tyler, I. (2012). Austerity parenting: New economies of parent-citizenship. Studies in the Maternal, 4(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  34. MacLean, A., Harden, J., & Backett-Milburn, K. (2010). Financial trajectories: How parents and children discussed the impact of the recession. Twenty-First Century Society, 5(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLeavy, J. (2011). A ‘new politics’ of austerity, workfare and gender? The UK coalition government’s welfare reform proposals. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(3), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malik, S. (2012). Pasty tax petition delivered to Downing Street. The Guardian. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
  37. McDowell, L., Ray, K., Perrons, D., Fagan, C., & Ward, K. (2005). Women’s paid work and moral economies of care. Social & Cultural Geography, 6(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monaghan, L. F. (2014). Editorial: Debating, theorising and researching “obesity” in challenging times. Social Theory & Health: Inaugural Special issue on Obesity, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
  39. Morgan, D. H. J. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Murcott, A. (1983). It’s a pleasure to cook for him: Food, meal times and gender in some South Wales households. In J. Morgan, D. Purvis, & D. Taylorson (Eds.), The public and the private (pp. 78–89). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  41. NHS. (2015). Change4life. National Health Service, UK. Accessed on 8 Oct 2015.
  42. Oswin, N., & Olund, E. (2010). Governing intimacy. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oxfam. (2013). The true cost of austerity and inequality: UK case study. Oxfam Case Study. Accessed 13 July 2015.
  44. Parrenas, R. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearson, R., & Elson, D. (2015). Transcending the impact of the financial crisis in the United Kingdom: Towards Plan F- a feminist economic strategy. Feminist Review, 109, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Popke, J. (2006). Geography and ethics: Everyday mediations through care and consumption. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ribbens McCarthy, J., Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2000). Moral tales of the child and the adult: Narratives of contemporary family lives under changing circumstances. Sociology, 34(4), 785–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. Thomson, R., Hadfield, L., Kehily, M. J., & Sharpe, S. (2010). Family fortunes: An intergenerational perspective on recession. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 5(2), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valentine, G. (2008). The ties that bind: Towards geographies of intimacy. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2097–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine, G., & Harris, C. (2014). Strivers vs skivers: Class prejudice and the demonisation of dependency in everyday life. Geoforum, 53, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valentine, G., Jayne, M., & Gould, M. (2012). Do as I say, not as I do: The affective space of family life and the generational transmission of drinking cultures. Environment & Planning A, 44(4), 776–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vanderbeck, R. (2007). Intergenerational geographies: age relations, segregation and re-engagements. Geography Compass, 1(2), 200–221.Google Scholar
  54. Vanderbeck, R. M., & Worth, N. (Eds.). (2015). Intergenerational Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography, School of Environment, Education and DevelopmentUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations