Skip to main content

Stereotypes and the Administration of Justice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action

Abstract

Stereotypes play a pervasive role in the administration of justice, influencing police stops and searches, the use of force, bail and sentencing decisions, juror behavior and selection, felony disenfranchisement, and attitudes toward mass incarceration. We provide a selective survey of the literature on stereotypes and criminal justice and discuss implications for witness cooperation, homicide clearance rates, and rates of murder victimization.

Prepared for the Handbook of Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action, edited by Ashwini Deshpande. We thank Ashwini Deshpande, Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela, and Morgan Williams Jr. for extremely helpful comments and suggestions, and Julie Seager, Emily Cai, and Olivia Bobrownicki for research assistance. Sethi thanks the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University for fellowship support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams DS, Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2012) Do judges vary in their treatment of race? J Leg Stud 41(2):347–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler JS (2006) First in violence, deepest in dirt: homicide in Chicago, 1875–1920. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agan A, Starr S (2018) Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: a field experiment. Q J Econ 133(1):191–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizer A, Doyle JJ (2015) Juvenile incarceration, human capital, and future crime: evidence from randomly assigned judges. Q J Econ 130(2):759–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof G, Yellen JL (1994) Gang behavior, law enforcement, and community values. In: Aaron HJ, Mann TE, Taylor T (eds) Values and public policy. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (2010) The New Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Perseus, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (2000) Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. WW Norton & Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics K, Knight BG (2009) A new look at racial profiling: evidence from the Boston police department. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar S, Fang H (2006) An alternative test of racial prejudice in motor vehicle searches: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 96(1):127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D, Dobbie W, Yang CS (2018) Racial bias in bail decisions. Q J Econ 133(4):1885–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D, Dobbie WS, Hull P (2020) Measuring racial discrimination in bail decisions. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres I (2002) Outcome tests of racial disparities in police practices. Justice Res Policy 4(1-2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldus DC, Woodworth G, Zuckerman D, Weiner NA (1997) Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: an empirical and legal overview with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Rev 83:1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2013) Blindspot: hidden biases of good people. Bantam

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerk D (2007) Racial profiling, statistical discrimination, and the effect of a colorblind policy on the crime rate. J Public Econ Theory 9(3):521–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS (1957) Going beyond the information given. Contemp Approach Cognit 1(1):119–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting WC, Garcia L, Edwards E (2013) The war on marijuana in black and white. American Civil Liberties Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Case A, Deaton A (2015) Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(49):15078–15083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfin A, Hansen B, Weisburst EK, Williams MC (2020) Police force size and civilian race. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 28202

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charles KK, Luoh MC (2010) Male incarceration, the marriage market, and female outcomes. Rev Econ Stat 92(3):614–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Hoekstra M (2013) Does strengthening self-defense law deter crime or escalate violence? Evidence from expansions to castle doctrine. J Hum Resour 48(3):821–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimeli AB, Soares RR (2017) The use of violence in illegal markets: evidence from mahogany trade in the Brazilian Amazon. Am Econ J Appl Econ 9(4):30–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JJ (2016) State of Minnesota v. Jeronimo Yanez: Press conference remarks as prepared for delivery, November 16, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates T-N (2015) Between the world and me. Spiegel & Grau

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PJ, Ludwig J, Venkatesh S, Braga AA (2007) Underground gun markets. Econ J 117(524):F588–F618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll J, Park B, Judd CM, Wittenbrink B, Sadler MS, Keesee T (2007) Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(6):1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craigie T-A (2020) Ban the box, convictions, and public employment. Econ Inq 58(1):425–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell M (2015) Trafficking networks and the Mexican drug war. Am Econ Rev 105(6):1738–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie W, Goldin J, Yang CS (2018) The effects of pretrial detention on conviction, future crime, and employment: evidence from randomly assigned judges. Am Econ Rev 108(2):201–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doleac JL, Hansen B (2020) The unintended consequences of “ban the box”: statistical discrimination and employment outcomes when criminal histories are hidden. J Labor Econ 38(2):321–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Heckman JJ (2020) An empirical analysis of racial differences in police use of force: a comment. J Polit Econ 128(10):3998–4002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards F, Lee H, Esposito M (2019) Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(34):16793–16798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch BK, Audrey B, Brian Burghart D, Johnson R, Klinger D, Thomas K (2019) Using crowd-sourced data to explore police-related-deaths in the United States (2000–2017): the case of fatal encounters. Open Health Data 6(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders C, Welling J (2015) Police use of deadly force: state statutes 30 years after Garner. Saint Louis Univ Public Law Rev 35:109

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman J Jr (2017) Locking up our own: crime and punishment in Black America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer RG (2019) An empirical analysis of racial differences in police use of force. J Polit Econ 127(3):1210–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Fagan J, Kiss A (2007) An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. J Am Stat Assoc 102(479):813–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel S, Rao JM, Shroff R (2016) Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City stop-and-frisk policy. Ann Appl Stat 10(1):365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein J, Armstrong K (2020) Could this city hold the key to the future of policing in America? New York Times, July 12, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves F, Mello S (2021) A few bad apples? Racial bias in policing. Am Econ Rev 111(5):1406–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogger J, Ridgeway G (2006) Testing for racial profiling in traffic stops from behind a veil of darkness. J Am Stat Assoc 101(475):878–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt BE, Ludwig J (2006) Broken windows: new evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. Univ Chic Law Rev 73:271

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell E, Davis E (2020) Contacts between police and the public, 2018–statistical tables. Bureau of Justice Statics Report, NCJ, 255730

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart CL (2017) The real opioid emergency. The New York Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson W (2018) Twenty years of failure: many groups missed chances to stop Larry Nassar. Washington Post, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer HJ, Raphael S, Stoll MA (2006) Perceived criminality, criminal background checks, and the racial hiring practices of employers. J Law Econ 49(2):451–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs A (2006) When rappers keep their mouths shut tight. New York Times, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • James L, James SM, Vila BJ (2016) The reverse racism effect: are cops more hesitant to shoot black than white suspects? Criminol Public Policy 15(2):457–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlins M, Coffman TL, Walters G (1969) On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. J Pers Soc Psychol 13(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Braly K (1933) Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 28(3):280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy R (1998) Race, Crime, and the Law. Vintage

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg J, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Q J Econ 133(1):237–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles J, Persico N, Todd P (2001) Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: theory and evidence. J Polit Econ 109(1):203–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox D, Lowe W, Mummolo J (2020) Administrative records mask racially biased policing. Am Polit Sci Rev 114(3):619–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocieniewski D (2007) A little girl shot, and a crowd that didn’t see. New York Times, July 9, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C (2005) The value of life in death: multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. J Crim Just 33(6):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legewie J (2016) Racial profiling and use of force in police stops: how local events trigger periods of increased discrimination. Am J Sociol 122(2):379–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leovy J (2015) Ghettoside: a true story of murder in America. One World/Ballantine

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie E, Pope NG (2017) The unintended impact of pretrial detention on case outcomes: evidence from New York City arraignments. J Law Econ 60(3):529–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindo JM, Padilla-Romo M (2018) Kingpin approaches to fighting crime and community violence: evidence from Mexico’s drug war. J Health Econ 58:253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann W (1922) Public Opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwack LF (1980) Been in the storm so long: the aftermath of slavery. Vintage

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury GC (2002) The anatomy of racial inequality. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery W, Kelly K, Mellnik T, Rich S (2018) Where killings go unsolved. The Washington Post, June 6, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald J, Braga AA (2019) Did post-Floyd et al. reforms reduce racial disparities in NYPD stop, question, and frisk practices? An exploratory analysis using external and internal benchmarks. Justice Q 36(5):954–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madon S, Guyll M, Aboufadel K, Montiel E, Smith A, Palumbo P, Lee J (2001) Ethnic and national stereotypes: the Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 27(8):996–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan C, Tekin E (2017) Stand your ground laws, homicides, and injuries. J Hum Resour 52(3):621–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre F, Baradaran S (2013) Race, prediction, and pretrial detention. J Empir Leg Stud 10(4):741–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron JA (2004) Drug war crimes: the consequences of prohibition. Independent Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskos P (2016) Philando Castile. Cop in the Hood, July 7, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan S (2015) Police killings of blacks: here is what the data say. New York Times, October 18, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1944) An American Dilemma: the Negro problem and modern democracy. Harper

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2010a) Homicide in black and white. J Urban Econ 68(3):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2010b) Peaceable kingdoms and war zones: preemption, ballistics and murder in Newark. In: Di Tella R, Edwards S, Schargrodsky E (eds) The economics of crime: lessons for and from Latin America. University of Chicago Press, pp 305–353

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2010c) The racial geography of street vice. J Urban Econ 67(3):270–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2010d) Witness intimidation. J Leg Stud 39(2):399–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2015) Urban crime. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics:1519–1621

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty B, Sethi R (2019) Shadows of doubt: stereotypes, crime, and the pursuit of justice. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okrent D (2010) Last call: the rise and fall of prohibition. Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens EG (2014) The American temperance movement and market-based violence. Am Law Econ Rev 16(2):433–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos AV (2009) Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. Am J Sociol 115(1):74–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos AV, Wildeman C, Roberto E (2015) Tragic, but not random: the social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Soc Sci Med 125:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff J (2017) Locked. In: The true causes of mass incarceration–and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson E, Simoiu C, Overgoor J, Corbett-Davies S, Jenson D, Shoemaker A, Ramachandran V, Barghouty P, Phillips C, Shroff R, Goel S (2020) A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States. Nat Hum Behav 4(7):736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker H (1939) After freedom. Viking Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Puckett JL, Lundman RJ (2003) Factors affecting homicide clearances: multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. J Res Crime Delinq 40(2):171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehavi MM, Starr SB (2014) Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. J Polit Econ 122(6):1320–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich T, Tulsky F (1996) Not all L.A. murder cases are equal. Los Angeles Times, December 3, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz GL, Jahn JL (2020) Mapping fatal police violence across US metropolitan areas: overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013–2017. PLoS One 15(6):e0229686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi R (2020) Crime and punishment in a divided society. In: Allen D, Somanathan R (eds) Difference without domination: pursuing justice in diverse democracies. University of Chicago Press, pp 93–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW (2018) Reducing fatal police shootings as system crashes: research, theory, and practice. Annu Rev Criminol 1:421–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklansky DA (1995) Cocaine, race, and equal protection. Stanford Law Rev:1283–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Capecchi C, Furber M (2016) Peaceful protests follow Minnesota governors call for calm. New York Times, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Department of Public Safety (2014) Second follow up: trooper involved shooting in Richland County on September 4, 19, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele CM (2010) Whistling Vivaldi: how stereotypes affect us and what we can do. WW Norton & Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR (2006) Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice (2015a) Report regarding the shooting death of Michael Brown by Ferguson, Missouri Police Officer Darren Wilson, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice (2015b) Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States General Accounting Office (1990) Death penalty sentencing: research indicates pattern of racial disparities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Kerner Commission (1968) Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. US Government Printing Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington BT (1915) My view of segregation laws. The New Republic

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden RE, McLean SJ, Engel RS, Cochran H, Corsaro N, Reynolds D, Najdowski CJ, Isaza GT (2020) The impacts of implicit bias awareness training in the NYPD. The John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety/University of Cincinnati Center for Police Research and Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring FE (2017) When police kill. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Brendan O’Flaherty or Rajiv Sethi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

O’Flaherty, B., Sethi, R. (2022). Stereotypes and the Administration of Justice. In: Deshpande, A. (eds) Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_10-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_10-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4016-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4016-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics