Skip to main content

Assessment and Parents

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Synonyms

Caregivers; Classroom assessment; Evaluation; Examination; Families; Guardians; Testing

Introduction

Parents are important educational stakeholders, and their relationship with assessment is bi-directional in that they both influence their child’s results and are also influenced by those results. The term parent is used to refer to anyone fulfilling parental or guardian roles (i.e., caring for and making educational decisions on behalf of the child). Hence, in addition to or instead of a biological parent, this person could be a grandparent, step-parent, carer, foster parent, adoptive parent, other relative, guardian, or, in some cultures, a collective group of adults.

While parents do not generally have any direct say in how their child is assessed [although parent opinion does impact on assessment policy (Buckendahl 2016)], many parents actively interpret and use assessment data, whether to better understand their own child’s progress or to form opinions about the quality...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bong, M. (2008). Effects of parent–child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, H. I., & Mislevy, R. (2005). Intuitive Test Theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The public understanding of assessment in educational reform in the United States. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 52–71. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). The future of assessment as a human and social endeavour. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 506–523). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckendahl, C. W. (2016). Public perceptions about assessment in education. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 454–471). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D., & Lam, R. (2014). The examined life: perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3–13, 42(3), 313–329. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.689988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parental education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1023/a:1009048817385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Nind, M., & Sheehy, K. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: Assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 801–817. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. R. (2015, April 16–20). Reviewing research on parent attitudes towards school assessment: Implications for classroom assessment practices. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W. (2013). Misleading the public understanding of assessment: Wilful or wrongful interpretation by government and media. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 128–138. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2004). O le tala ia Lita-Lita’s story: The challenge of reporting achievement to parents. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, E., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions that matter to achievement: Student feelings about assessment. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 111–128). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lois Ruth Harris or Gavin T. L. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Harris, L.R., Brown, G.T.L. (2017). Assessment and Parents. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_538

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics