Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Mathematics Education as a Matter of Cognition

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_520

Introduction

The word cognition is defined in most dictionaries as (1) process of knowing, (2) something that is known, (3) thinking, (4) perception, and (5) study of the mind. There are numerous other meanings that can be found in the domains of psychology, biology, philosophy, sociology, linguistics, and phenomenology. However, for mathematics education the primary focus has been on psychology and secondarily on biology, philosophy, and sociology. Therefore, an exploration of mathematics education as a matter of cognition implies describing and analyzing the domain of mathematics education as evolving in its notion of cognition from its roots in psychology and moving onto domains that broaden the notion of “cognition” for mathematics education researchers. There are three objectives:
  1. (a)

    To determine a “starting point” (if any) for research on cognition in mathematics education.

     
  2. (b)

    To unfold the development of mathematics education as a field of research based on its interaction...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander, P. A., & Winne, P. H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Ansari, D., & Lyons, I. M. (2016). Cognitive neuroscience and mathematics learning: How far have we come? Where do we need to go? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, D. C. (2006). Educational psychology: Searching for essence throughout a century of influence. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–27). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Beth, E. W., & Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Callebaut, W. (1987). Why it makes sense to extend the genotype/phenotype distinction to culture. La Nuova Critica, Nuova Serie I-II, Problemi epistemology della biologia, 2, 65.Google Scholar
  7. Dietrich, O. (2004). Cognitive evolution. In F. M. Wuketits & C. Antweiler (Eds.), Handbook of evolution (pp. 25–77). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: From phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 631–654). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Haeckel, E. (1874). Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  10. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  11. Lesh, R., Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2014). Theories of learning mathematics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 615–623). Dordrecht: Springer Reference.Google Scholar
  12. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2004). Combinatorial mathematics: Research into practice. Connecting research into teaching. Mathematics Teacher, 98(3), 182–191.Google Scholar
  14. Sriraman, B., & English, L. D. (Eds.). (2010). Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (Advances in mathematics education, series). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Sriraman, B., & Lesh, R. (2007). Leaders in mathematical thinking & learning- a conversation with Zoltan P. Dienes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 9(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steffe, L. P. (1995). Alternative epistemologies: An educator’s perspective. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 489–523). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Törner, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A brief historical comparison of tendencies in mathematics didactics/education research in Germany and the United States. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Seoul National UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)