Introduction
A curriculum studies perspective on mathematics education acknowledges the broadest possible views of curriculum, including content and organization of school mathematics and the social context in which mathematics is situated in and out of schools, as well as formal and informal processes of mathematical enculturation and acculturation. Beyond scope and sequence of mathematics skills and concepts, it is valuable to question basic assumptions and metaphors implicit in current practices and to generate alternatives. For example, instead of tweaking pedagogy to improve test results related to problem solving, this perspective explores alternatives – learners posing their own problems, categorizing problems or critiquing them instead of solving them, or judging the importance of a problem in terms of its implications (Brown 2001). Or, instead of identifying the best sequence of skill objectives, it creates opportunities for administrators and families to share their...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Appelbaum, P. (2009). Taking action – Mathematics curricular organization for effective teaching and learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(2), 38–43.
Bratton, J., Civil, M., & Quintos, B. (2005). Engaging with parents on a critical dialogue about mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1182–1192). Sant Feliu de Guíxols: FUNDEMI IQS, Universitat Ramon Llull.
Brown, S. I. (2001). Reconstructing school mathematics: Problems with problems and the real world. New York: Peter Lang.
Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to curriculum reform. Theory Into Practice, 34(1), 4–11.
Eisner, E. (1985). The educational imagination. On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Embracing “Nepantla:” Rethinking knowledge and its use in teaching. REDIMAT-Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56.
Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.
Jahnke, T., & Meyerhöfer, W. (2007). PISA & CO. Kritik eines Programms. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
Knijnik, G. (2002). Curriculum, culture, and ethnomathematics: The practices of ‘cubagem of wood’ in the Brazilian landless movement. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 149–165.
Leonard, J., & Martin, D. (2013). The brilliance of Black children in mathematics. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Rotman, B. (1993). Ad infinitum… The ghost in Turing’s machine: Taking god out of mathematics and putting the body back in. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Sack, J. (2008). Commonplace intersections within a high school mathematics leadership institute. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 189–199.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2005). Mathematics education and social justice: Facing the paradoxes of the informational society. Utbildning & Demokrati, 14(2), 57–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Appelbaum, P., Stathopoulou, C. (2017). Mathematics Education as a Matter of Curriculum. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_515
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_515
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-587-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-588-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education