Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Mentoring and Decolonization

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_511

Introduction

What is the intent of mentoring university students from marginalized groups: students of color, first-generation, low-income, LGBTQ, and disabled students? Is it merely to increase their numeric representation in higher education and atone for past wrongs? This would serve only to assimilate marginalized and minoritized students into academic norms, values, experiences, and dominant knowledge systems that are the heritage of European colonization. However, given that these students can bring unique perspectives to bear on the deeply pressing social and scientific concerns of our times, mentors might take a decolonizing approach that could transform the academy by introducing powerful subjugated knowledges and new research methodologies.

Because mentors teach Eurocentric disciplinary norms and knowledge bases – the rules of the game, so to speak – they risk alienating students from marginalized groups; this is especially so when mentoring occurs across social differences....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Beyene, T., Anglin, M., & Sanchez, W. (2002). Mentoring and relational mutuality: Proteges’ perspectives. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 41, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hinsdale, M. J. (2015). Mutuality, mystery, and mentorship in higher education. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hurtado, S. (1992). The campus racial climate: Contexts of conflict. The Journal of Higher Education, 5(63), 539–569.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, W. B. (2007). On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Margonis, F. (2007). John Dewey, W.E.B. DuBois, and Alain Locke: A case study in white ignorance and intellectual segregation. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 173–195). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. Margonis, F. (2011). Addressing students responsively and critically. In R. Kunzman (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2011 (pp. 271–279). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
  9. Oliver, K. (2001). Witnessing: Beyond recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33–40.Google Scholar
  11. Pratt, M. L. (2008). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Quijano, A. (2001). Globalizacio´n, colonialidad y democracia. In Instituto de Altos Estudios Diploma´ticos ‘Pedro Gual’ (Ed.), Tendencias ba´sicas de nuestra e´poca: globalizacio´n y democracia (pp. 25–61). Caracas: Instituto de Altos Estudios Diploma´ticos ‘Pedro Gual’.Google Scholar
  13. Schultz, K. (2003). Listening to know particular students. In Listening (pp. 19–38). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquelin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 4(62), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Westminster CollegeSalt Lake CityUSA