Introduction
The term “indigenous,” an instantly global one, has undoubtedly been incredibly helpful in mobilizing political change. But some more subtle, and nevertheless important, colonizing aspects about the term can be discerned, including its natural tendency to normalize diverse groups. This critique of the term rests in the possibility that global discourses can threaten to be homogenizing if their users are not careful. They may be used tactically and in that sense are merely useful shorthand for a much more complex set of circumstances that simply cannot be accounted for individually; however, the term “indigenous” is also extended to other phenomena, such as “knowledge” and then by implication “science,” and so its reach moves beyond just its own sphere. What may be at stake here are tensions between individual indigenous people and their innate differences between each other on the one hand and the grander pronouncements that arise in literature about indigenous belief...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Battiste, M., & Henderson, J. (2000). Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon, Canada: Purich Publishing.
Corntassel, J. (2003). Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 9(1), 75–100.
Deloria, V., Jr. (2001). American Indian metaphysics. In V. Deloria Jr. & D. Wildcat (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 1–6). Golden: Fulcrum Resources.
Lawson, E., & Bertucci, M. L. (1996). Encyclopedia of human rights (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Lawson-Te Aho, K. (2013). Whāia Te Mauriora-In pursuit of healing: Theorising connections between soul healing, tribal self-determination and Māori suicide prevention in Aotearoa/New Zealand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10063/3086
Mika, C., & Stewart, G. (2015). Maori in the kingdom of the Gaze: Subjects or critics? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–13. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1013017.
Rangihau, J. (1992). Being Maori. In M. King (Ed.), Te Ao Hurihuri: Aspects of Maoritanga (pp. 183–190). Auckland, New Zealand: Reed Publishing Ltd.
Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. (2004). The concept of indigenous peoples. (PFII/2004/WS.1/3). New York: United Nations.
Semali, L., & Kincheloe, J. (1999). Introduction: What is indigenous knowledge and why should we study it? In L. Semali & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 3–57). New York: Falmer Press.
Taiaiake, A., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mika, C. (2017). Questions on the Global Indigenous. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_509
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_509
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-587-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-588-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education