Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Formation of School Subjects

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_5

Introduction

This entry examines the history of subject knowledge from the early 1960s to date, through the work of critical theorists and sociologists. It looks at the reexamination of the role of sociological and historical methods in the study of curriculum and the importance of understanding the social history of the school curriculum and in particular school subjects.

Studying Subject Knowledge

In Britain in the early 1970s, there was a wave of change in secondary schooling from a previously selective “tripartite” system toward a fully comprehensive system where all types and abilities of children were grouped under the roof of one school. This transformation in the organization of secondary schooling led to an interesting series of curriculum debates both within schools and outside schools about the form that the comprehensive school curriculum should take. In addition to comprehensive reorganization, the regime of school examinations was fairly liberal at the time and a good...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgments

This contribution was supported by the research project IUT18-2 “Teachers' professionality and professionalism in changing context”.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Esland, G. M. (1971). Teaching and learning as the organization of knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Franklin, B. (1986). Building the American community. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Goodson, I. F. (Ed.). (1985). Social histories of the secondary curriculum. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goodson, I. F. (2014). Curriculum, personal narrative and the social future. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, D. (1989). Towards a theory of schooling. London/New York: Routledge; reissued 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Hirst, P. M. (1967). The logical and psychological aspects of teaching a subject. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Hirst, P. M. (1976). The educational implications of social and economic change in schools council working paper no 12. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Hirst, P. M., & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Kliebard, H. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–1958. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Kliebard, H. (1992). Forging the American curriculum: Essays in curriculum history and theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Macdonald, B., & Walker, R. (1976). Changing the curriculum. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  13. Musgrove, F. (1968). The contribution of sociology to the study of the curriculum. In J. F. Kerr (Ed.), Changing the curriculum. London: University of London.Google Scholar
  14. Phenix, P. M. (1964). The realms of meaning. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Popkewitz, T. (1987). Critical studies in teacher education: Its folklore, theory and practice. Falmer: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  16. Shipman, M. D., Bolam, D., & Jenkins, D. R. (1974) Inside a curriculum project: A case study in the process of curriculum Change. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  17. Waring, M. (1975). Aspects of the dynamics of curriculumreform in secondary school science. Unpublished Ph.D., University of London, London.Google Scholar
  18. Young, M. F. D. (Ed.). (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Young, M. F. D. (1977). School science – Innovations or alienation. In P. Woods & M. Hammersley (Eds.), School experience. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  20. Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TallinnTallinnEstonia