Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Convergence of Inclusive Education and Disability Studies: A Critical Framework

  • Katie Roquemore
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_474

Disability studies is an academic field of study that emerged alongside the Disability Rights Movement. Disability studies is an interdisciplinary field which acknowledges that disability “sits at the intersection of many overlapping disciplines in the humanities, sciences, and social sciences” (“What is Disability Studies?”). Goals of disability studies scholars and programs include: challenging the view of disability as an individual deficit that can be fixed through medical intervention or rehabilitation; exploring models and theories that examine economic, political, cultural, and social factors that define disability; working to destigmatize disease, illness, and impairment; and interrogating the connections between medical practices of disability and stigma (“What is Disability Studies?”). Disability studies has numerous philosophical foundations that relate to the various political, social, and economic aspects of disability and society as a whole.

One such philosophical and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, A., Armstrong, D., & Spandagou, I. (2010). Globalization: Internationalization of inclusive education. In A. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & I. Spandagou (Eds.), Inclusive education: International policy & practice (pp. 43–54). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Baglieri, S., Bejoian, L., Broderick, A., Connor, D., & Valle, J. (2011). [Re]claiming “inclusive education” toward cohesion in educational reform: Disability studies unravels the myth of the normal child. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2122–2154.Google Scholar
  4. Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to “accurate”, theoretical representation of disabled people’s experience? Disability & Society, 14(5), 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. deBettencourt, L. (2002). Understanding the differences between IDEA and Section 504. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400, 300.1.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, B. (2013). Special Education Guide. Retrieved from http://www.specialeducationguide.com/
  9. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mutua, K., & Smith, R. M. (2008). Disrupting normalcy and the practical concerns of classroom teachers. In S. Danforth & S. L. Gabel (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. 121–132). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Pfeiffer, D. (2002). The philosophical foundations of disabilities studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Research in social science and disability (pp. 9–28).Google Scholar
  13. Silvers, A. (2000). Philosophy & disability: An overview. Philosophy Now, 30. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/30/Philosophy_and_Disability_an_overview
  14. Slee, R. (2001). Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: The case of inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2/3), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor, S. J. (2008). Before it had a name: Exploring the historical roots of disability studies in education. In S. Danforth & S. L. Gabel (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (xiii-xxiii). New York: Peter Lang Publishing..Google Scholar
  16. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Special education- theory and theory talk. In G. Thomas & A. Loxley (Eds.), Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham: University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (2005). Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  18. Wasserman, D., Asch, A., Blustein, J., & Putnam, D. (2015). Disability: Definitions, models, experience. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/disability/.
  19. “What is Disability Studies.” Society for Disability Studies. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.disstudies.org/about/what_is_ds
  20. Zaretsky, L. (2005). From practice to theory: Inclusive models require inclusive theories. American Secondary Education, 33(3), 65–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Laura Jaffee
    • 1
  • Ashley Taylor
    • 2
  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Colgate UniversityHamiltonUSA