Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Feminization Thesis: Gender and Higher Education

  • Sarah Jane Aiston
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_433

Introduction

In contemporary society, women have made significant gains in terms of their participation rate as undergraduate students worldwide, to the extent to which a feminization of higher education thesis has been put forward. Claims have arisen that women are “taking over” higher education, not only in terms of student numbers, but also the culture of universities (Leathwood and Read 2009).

But to what extent has an increase in the number of women in higher education led to a reconceptualization of gender and the university as a “space” in which women are no longer “out of place” (Aiston 2006)? There are many indicators to suggest otherwise, for example, prevailing sexism, “laddism” and a culture of harassment that has been identified as an aspect of university life for women undergraduates in the UK and the USA (NUS 2013). In Mainland China, the dominant discourse of graduate women as a “third sex” (men, women, women with PhDs) represents highly educated women as troublesome...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aiston, S. J. (2006). A woman’s place…: Male representations of university women in the student press of the University of Liverpool 1944 to 1979. Women’s History Review, 15(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiston, S. J. (2014). Leading the academy or being led? Hong Kong women academics. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(1), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiston, S. J. (In press, 2017). The third sex: Women in Chinese higher education as troublesome transgressives. In: Morley. L (ed.) The Europa world of learning 2017: Gender and access to and participation in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 1, 12–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison (with J Jung). Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220, Special Issue: Re/gendering the Academy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the disciplines. SHRE/Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, S. (2013). Rethinking the moral significance of micro-inequities: The case of women in philosophy. In K. Hutchinson & F. Jenkins (Eds.), Women in philosophy: What needs to change? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, L., & West-Burnham, J. (2010). Education for social justice: Achieving wellbeing for all. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Hansard Society Commission. (1990). Women at the top. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
  9. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminised future? Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, S. (2015, August 17). Gender gap widens as women graduates outpace the men. The Australian.Google Scholar
  11. Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(1), 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NUS. (2013). That’s what she said: Women students’ experiences of ‘lad culture’ in higher education. NUS/University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Saenz, V. B., & Ponjuan, L. (2009). The vanishing Latino male in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(1), 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK