Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Competitive Education Harms Moral Growth

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_422

Introduction

The growth of a human being has many aspects including morality among its important features. The major traditions of moral philosophy and moral education maintain that morality consists of cultivating altruism in its different forms such as benevolence, generosity, and friendliness. The opposite of altruism, egoism, is consequently among the key problems of moral education. The human ego is an important phenomena’s of moral education and also key for understanding competitive behavior and motivation. Competition is social action by nature involving at least two subjects trying to outdo each other. The term moral subjectivity refers to individual morality emerging at the crossroad of the individual, cultural, societal, and historical. Competitive human ego is, therefore, constructed as a moral subjectivity by learning language, culture, and ways of interacting in a particular kind of society with a particular history. Egoism is among the hindrances of growing a sound moral...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Elias, N. (1982). Power & civility. The civilizing process: Volume II. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  2. Fromm, E. (1986). Man for himself. An enquiry into the psychology of ethics. London/Boston/Melbourne/Henley: Ark paperbacks.Google Scholar
  3. Hirschman, A. O. (1982). The passions and the interests. Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Horney, K. (1964). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  6. Marglin, S. (2009). The dismal science. How thinking like an economist undermine community. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Montagu, A. (1952). Darwin, competition & cooperation. New York: Henry Schumann Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Nicolls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  10. Veblen, T. (2008). The theory of the leisure class. Project Gutenberg E-book. Retrieved in 19 Jan 2016. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/833/833-h/833-h.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland