Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Honneth on Moral Growth

  • Teemu Hanhela
  • Rauno Huttunen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_421

Introduction

Axel Honneth is the foremost representative of the so called third generation of the Frankfurt School. He started his academic career as a Habermasian Marxist influenced by Foucault’s philosophical and anthropological ideas. In his early writings, Honneth connected Foucault with the tradition of critical theory. Honneth launched his theory of recognition in 1994 and re-orientated the whole Frankfurt School research. Ever since there has been intensive discussion concerning the Honnethian theory of recognition.

Honneth’s project is distinctive and central to the third generation of critical theory including, first, the idea of society and history based on the struggle for recognition by social groups. Second, Honneth contextualises the normative foundations in the deep structures of subjective experiences such as disrespect and misrecognition. These ideas, struggles and subjective experiences, are elicited from Hegel’s philosophy. The first element, the idea of the struggle...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Böckenförde, E.-W. (1991). State, society, and liberty: Studies in political theory and constitutional law. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  2. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Natural law. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). System of ethical life 1802–1803. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hirvonen, O. (2016). Democratic institutions and recognition of individual identities. Thesis Eleven, 134(1), 28–41. doi:10.1177/0725513616646023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Honneth, A. (1995). Struggle for recognition – The moral grammar of social conflicts. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64(1), 111–126.Google Scholar
  8. Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect – The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Honneth, A. (2012). Erziehung und demokratische Öffentlichkeit. Ein vernachlässigtes Kapitel der politischen Philosophie. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15(3), 429–442. doi: 10.1007/s11618-012-0285-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Honneth, A. (2013). Education and the public sphere – A neglected chapter of political philosophy. http://abcdemocracy.net/2013/03/22/axel-honneth-on-educationand-the-public-sphere/. Cited 25 June 2015.
  11. Honneth, A. (2015). Education and the democratic public sphere: A neglected chapter of political philosophy. In J. Jakosen & O. Lysaker (Eds.), Recognition and freedom – Axel Honneth’s political thought (pp. 17–33). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Huttunen, R. (2011). Hegelians Axel Honneth and Robert Williams on the development of human morality. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31, 339–355. doi: 10.1007/s11217-011-9278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kakkori, L., & Huttunen, R. (2010). The Gilligan-Kohlberg controversy and its philosophico-historical roots. In M. Peters, P. Ghiraldelli, B. Zarnic & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of philosophy of education. http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=the_gilligan_kohlberg_controversy_and_its_philosophicohistorical_roots. Cited 5 Jan 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.University of TurkuTurkuFinland
  3. 3.University of JoensuuJoensuuFinland