Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Open Works, Open Cultures, and Open Learning Systems

  • Michael A. Peters
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_412

Open Works

The idea of openness as a political, social, and psychological metaphor has been part of a set of enduring narratives in the West since the time before the flourishing of modern democracy, scientific communication, and the rise of the knowledge economy. Principally these narratives have been about the nature of freedom, the primacy of rights to self-expression, the constitution of the public sphere or the commons, and the intimate link between openness and creativity. The core philosophical idea concerns openness to experience and interpretation such that a work, language, and system permit multiple meanings and interpretations with an accent on the response, imagination, and activity of the reader, learner, or user. The classic work that philosophically develops this central idea is the Philosophical Investigations by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953) who draws a close relationship between language as a set of open overlapping speech activities or discourses he calls “language...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bauwens, M. (2005). The political economy of peer production’, C-theory. Retrieved from http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499.
  2. Blair, D. (2006). Wittgenstein, language and information. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hrachovec, H., & Pichler, A. (eds.) (2007). Philosophy of the information, society proceedings of the 30th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria.Google Scholar
  4. Jung, R. E., Gasparovic, C., Chavez, R. S., Flores, R. A., Smith, S. M., Capriha, A., & Yeo, R. A. (2009). Biochemical support for the “threshold” theory of creativity: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(16), 5319–5325. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0588-09.2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lessig, L. (2007). Foreword. In M. L. Kembrew (Ed.), Freedom of expression: Resistance and repression in the age of intellectual property. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. May, C. (2006). Openness, the knowledge commons and the critique of intellectual property, Re-public: re-imagining democracy. Retrieved from http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=88|
  7. May, C. (2008). Globalizing the logic of openness: Open source software and the global governance of intellectual property. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mill, Van, D. (2002). Freedom of speech. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/
  10. Momigliano, A. (2003). Freedom of speech in antiquity. In Dictionary of the history of ideas. Retrieved from http://historyofideas.org
  11. Peters, M., & Marshall, J. (1999). Wittgenstein: Philosophy, postmodernism, pedagogy. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  12. Picher, A. (2002). Encoding Wittgenstein: Some remarks on Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, the Bergen Electronic Edition, and future electronic publishing and networking. In: TRANS. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften. No. 10/2001ff. Retrieved from http://www.inst.at/trans/10Nr/pichler10.htm
  13. Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  14. Sampson, T. (2004). The virus in the open system – A virus in info-space: The open network and its enemies. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 7(3). Retrieved from http://vx.netlux.org/lib/mts00.html
  15. Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weitz, M. (1956). The role of theory in aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15(1), 27–35. Retrieved from http://nanay.syr.edu/Weitz%201956.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). The philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand