Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Fairness in Educational Assessment

  • Robin D. Tierney
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_400

Synonyms

Introduction

Fairness is a moral virtue and a fundamental quality in educational assessment. Understanding of fairness in educational assessment has evolved with developments in learning theory and measurement, and it has increasingly been recognized as a necessary quality for inclusivity in education. Fairness is closely related to, but distinct from, the societal concepts of equality, equity, and justice and the measurement concepts of bias, reliability, and validity. In practice, three conditions contribute to fairer educational assessment: opportunity to learn, a constructive environment, and evaluative thinking. Multiple strategies, revolving around the principle of transparency and the provision of opportunity to demonstrate learning, should be used to ensure fairer educational assessment for diverse learners.

The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, J., Archibald, T., Hargraves, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2015). Defining and teaching evaluative thinking: Insights from research on critical thinking. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(3), 375–388. doi:10.1177/1098214015581706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowie, B. (2014). Equity, ethics and engagement: Principles for quality formative assessment in primary science classrooms. In C. Milne, K. G. Tobin, & D. Degenero (Eds.), Sociocultural studies and implications for science education (Vol. 12, pp. 117–133). Dortrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorn, S. (2014). Testing like William the conqueror: Cultural and instrumental uses of examinations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(119), 1–11. doi:10.14507/epaa.v22.1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, D. H. (2012). Fairness and freedom: A history of two open societies, New Zealand and the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Giordano, G. (2005). How testing came to dominate American schools: The history of educational assessment. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2009). Fairness in assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 105–118). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klenowski, V. (2015). Fair assessment as social practice. Assessment Matters, 8, 76–93. doi:10.18296/am.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C., Gee, J. P., Haertel, E. H., & Young, L. J. (2008). Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tierney, R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research-for-LearningSan JoseUSA