Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters


  • Bernadette BakerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_298

This entry concerns ruptures and continuities in the modern Western child as it shifts from what is now called natural philosophy to political philosophy to psychology, a shift which enabled developmental psychology to become the dominant discipline for inscribing the child in educational discourse over the twentieth century.

In Sight and Out of Mind: Descartes’ Child

And here the first and principal cause of all errors can be recognized. For in childhood, our mind was of course so closely bound to the body that it did not apply itself to any thoughts other than those by means of which it was aware of those things which affected the body: and it did not yet relate those to something situated outside itself; but merely felt pain when something disagreeable occurred to the body; and pleasure when something agreeable occurred (Descartes 1983, p. 32, art.71).

For Descartes (1596-1650), the first and principal of all errors (in arriving at Truth) lay in a near mind-body fusion inscribed as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Baker, B. (2001). In perpetual motion: Theories of power, educational history, and the child. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, B. (2015). From ‘somatic scandals’ to a ‘constant potential for violence’: The culture of dissection, brain-based learning and the rewriting/rewiring of “the child”. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 12(2), 168–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Descartes, R. (1644/1983). Principles of philsophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  4. Filmer, R. (1680/1887). Patriarcha; or, the natural power of Kings. In I. J. Locke's (Ed.), Two Treatises on Civil Government (pp. 11–73). London: George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, G. S. (1901). The ideal school as based on child study. The Forum, 32(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vol. 1). New York: Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
  7. Herbart, J. (1977a). Aesthetic revelation of the world. In D. Robertson (Ed.), Significant contributions to the history of psychology, 1750–1920 (pp. 57–77). Washington, DC: University Publications of America (Original work published 1804).Google Scholar
  8. Herbart, J. (1977b). The science of education. In D. Robertson (Ed.), Significant contributions to the history of psychology, 1750–1920 (pp. 78–268). Washington, DC: University Publications of America (Original work published 1806).Google Scholar
  9. Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Locke, J. (1689/1965). Two treatises of government. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  11. Locke, J. (1692/1975). Essay concerning human understanding. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Locke, J. (1692/1989). Some thoughts concerning education (edited with ontroduction, notes, and critical apparatus by John W. and Jean S. Yolton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rousseau, J. J. (1973). The social contract and Discourses / translation and introductionby G.D.H. Cole ; revised and augmented by J.H. Brumfitt and John C. Hall. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Rousseau, J. J. (1979). Emile or On Education. Introduction, Translation, and Notes by Allan Bloom. no place of publication given: Basic Books (Original work pulished in 1762).Google Scholar
  15. Rousseau, J. J. (1992). Discourse on the origins of inequality (second discourse), polemics, and political economy (R. D. M. Judith R. Bush, Christopher Kelly, and Terence Marshall, Trans. Originally published 1755 ed. Vol. 3). Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, E. (1994). An epistemological critique of experimentalism in psychology: Or, why G. Stanley Hall waited until William James was out of town to found the American Psychological Association. In H. Adler & R. Rieber (Eds.), Aspects of the history of psychology in America 1892/1992 (pp. 37–61). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of Technology and University of Wisconsin-MadisonBrisbaneAustralia