Introduction
This entry aims to elucidate some of the ontological assumptions, questions, and debates that have emerged in the field of education and, more specifically, educational administration. Ontology, in its most basic formulation, has been defined as the study of “being,” namely, the nature, constitution, and manifestation of reality. This entry examines one salient example of this type of inquiry in the field of educational administration: the question about the ontological status of educational organizations.
From its very beginnings, educational administration, as a field of study, has been concerned with questions about “being,” particularly regarding the nature and constitution of “reality” in educational organizations. Oplatka (2009) indicated that while theoretical tensions, conversations, and debates in the literature are diverse, they are necessary in order to critically interrogate the questions, problems, areas, and objects of study of researchers and practitioners...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Blackmore, J. (2013). A feminist critical perspective on educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 139–154.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2000). Doing educational administration: A theory of administrative practice. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2012). Science, systems, and theoretical alternatives in educational administration: The road less travelled. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 57–75.
Gunter, H. (2005). Conceptualizing research in educational leadership. Educational Administration Abstracts, 40(3), 165–180.
Hartley, D. (2010). Paradigms: How far does research in distributed leadership ‘stretch’? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 271–285.
Mueller, R. (2015). Basics of critical realism. In D. Burgess & P. Newton (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of educational administration. New York: Routledge.
Newton, P., & Riveros, A. (2015). Toward an ontology of practices in educational administration: Theoretical implications for research and practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 330–341.
Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8–35.
Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on Professional Learning Communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Riveros, A., Newton, P. (2017). Ontological Issues in Educational Administration: The Ontological Status of Educational Organizations. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_284
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_284
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-587-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-588-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education