Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Ontological Issues in Educational Administration: The Ontological Status of Educational Organizations

  • Augusto Riveros
  • Paul Newton
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_284

Introduction

This entry aims to elucidate some of the ontological assumptions, questions, and debates that have emerged in the field of education and, more specifically, educational administration. Ontology, in its most basic formulation, has been defined as the study of “being,” namely, the nature, constitution, and manifestation of reality. This entry examines one salient example of this type of inquiry in the field of educational administration: the question about the ontological status of educational organizations.

From its very beginnings, educational administration, as a field of study, has been concerned with questions about “being,” particularly regarding the nature and constitution of “reality” in educational organizations. Oplatka (2009) indicated that while theoretical tensions, conversations, and debates in the literature are diverse, they are necessary in order to critically interrogate the questions, problems, areas, and objects of study of researchers and practitioners...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blackmore, J. (2013). A feminist critical perspective on educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2000). Doing educational administration: A theory of administrative practice. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  4. Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2012). Science, systems, and theoretical alternatives in educational administration: The road less travelled. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gunter, H. (2005). Conceptualizing research in educational leadership. Educational Administration Abstracts, 40(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartley, D. (2010). Paradigms: How far does research in distributed leadership ‘stretch’? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mueller, R. (2015). Basics of critical realism. In D. Burgess & P. Newton (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of educational administration. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Newton, P., & Riveros, A. (2015). Toward an ontology of practices in educational administration: Theoretical implications for research and practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on Professional Learning Communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada