Skip to main content

Field of Educational Administration and Its Coevolving Epistemologies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 59 Accesses

Synonyms

Coevolution; Educational administration and management; Epistemological pluralism; Field of study

The theory and practice of educational administration and management have been arenas of competing intellectual traditions. Related literature elaborates on the strength and weaknesses of various research methods and practices, the corresponding epistemologies and, ultimately, the underlying philosophies of science. This entry opens with a historiography of administration and management studies and the question of whether educational administration and management constitutes a field of study in itself, and, if this is indeed the case, what could possibly be the field’s conditio sine qua non. It is suggested that it has been the very coexistence and coevolution of contentious administrative practices and theories that give way to the field, which continues to be withstood by a tension between scholarly pluralism and an intuitive/instinctive (hence, categorically irrational) belief...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bates, R. J. (1983). Educational administration and the management of knowledge. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blount, J. M. (2013). Educational leadership through equity, diversity, and social justice and educational leadership for the privilege imperative: The historical dialectic. In L. C. Tillman & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational leadership for equity and diversity (pp. 7–21). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1969). Intellectual field and creative project. Social Science Information, 8(2), 89–119. doi:10.1177/053901846900800205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (2012). Science, systems, and theoretical alternatives in educational administration: The road less travelled. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 57–75. doi:10.1108/09578231211196069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17(2), 57–80. doi:10.1007/BF01807469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OED. (2012). Oxford English Dictionary: The definitive record of the English language Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/

  • Park, J. (2015). Thematic approach to theoretical speculations in the field of educational administration. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 359–371. doi:10.1080/00131857.2014.976929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Park, J. (2017). Field of Educational Administration and Its Coevolving Epistemologies. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_283

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics