Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Marxism and Disability Studies

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_279

Synonyms

Introduction

Disability studies, a discipline that critically examines the meaning and implications of the social construction of dis/ability, provides a useful framework through which to understand the systemic oppression of disabled students, the construction of disability/ability in education, and disability-based oppression more broadly. Disability studies scholars and disability rights activists have long rejected the medical model of disability, which treats disability as an individual deficiency that necessitates medical intervention to “fix.” A disability studies perspective, on the other hand, understands disability as socially produced. Disablement is situated within social, political, and economic structures that ascribe its meaning within a particular place at a given historical moment. This framework illuminates how disability has been forged as an identity by those who share experiences of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Abberley, P. (1997). The limits of classical social theory in the analysis and transformation of disablement. In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present future (pp. 25–44). Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  2. Erevelles, N. (2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 50(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gleeson, B. (1997). Disability studies: A historical materialist view. Disability and Society, 12(2), 179–202. doi:10.1080/09687599727326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gleeson, B., & Kearns, R. (2001). Remoralising landscapes of care. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 61–80. doi:10.1068/d38j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 25(5), 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meekosha, H. (2004). Drifting down the Gulf Stream: Navigating the cultures of disability studies. Disability & Society, 19(7), 721–733. doi:10.1080/0968759042000284204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2010). Disability as multitude: Re-working non-productive labor power. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability Handicap & Society, 7(2), 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oliver, M. J. (1999). Capitalism, disability, and ideology: A materialist critique of the normalization principle. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 163–173). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  11. Russell, M. (2001). Disablement, oppression, and the political economy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(2), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell, M. (2002). What disability civil rights cannot do: Employment and political economy. Disability & Society, 17(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Russell, M., & Malhotra, R. (2002). Capitalism and disability. Socialist Register, 38, 211–228.Google Scholar
  14. Shakespeare, T. (2010). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 266–273). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Wiener, D., Ribeiro, R., & Warner, K. (2009). Mentalism, disability rights and modern eugenics in a ‘brave new world’. Disability & Society, 24(5), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA