Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

On Marxist Critical Ethnography

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_274

Introduction

First of all, my sincere thanks to the editorial team for inviting me to submit this chapter for publication in the present volume. In this entry, I will try to explore the connections between research and practice from a critical pedagogical perspective. Such connections are less frequently commented on than they should be, and this entry aims to make a contribution. It concerns policies regarding education research and its drivers, and pertains specifically to one mode of inquiry, that of educational ethnography, and its potential to provide a powerful critique of the operation of power and intentions to control societal and cognitive rhythms through dominant (i.e., white supremacist, hegemonic) ideologies emanating from the standardized knowledge industry and values of Anglo-centric capitalism (Malott 2010). The argument of this entry is that it is this kind of critique of how power is infused into education that should be the main democratic driving force of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allman, P. (1999). Revolutionary social transformation: Democratic hopes, political possibilities and critical education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. Allman.Google Scholar
  2. Banfield, G. (2004). What’s really wrong with ethnography? International Education Journal, 4(4), 53–63.Google Scholar
  3. Banfield, G. (2010). Marxism, critical realism and class: Implications for a socialist pedagogy. In D. Kelsh, D. Hill, & S. Mcrine (Eds.), Education and class: Knowledge, pedagogy, subjectivity (pp. 128–152). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, D. (2010a). Identifying Scandinavian ethnography: Comparisons and influences. Ethnography and Education, 5(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, D. (2010b). On the value of Marxism in the understanding and analysis of social class in educational ethnography and the misunderstanding of class as an epistemological category by critics of Marxist and other critical traditions. In S. Hillyard (Ed.), New frontiers in ethnography (Studies in qualitative methodology, Vol. 11). Bingley: Emerald Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beach, D. (2011). On structure and agency in ethnographies of education. European Educational Researcher Journal, 10, 471–482.Google Scholar
  7. Beach, D. (2014). Identifying Scandinavian ethnography: Articulating notions of theory and objectivity in the ethnography of education. In A. Tervooren, N. Engel, M. Göhlich, I. Miethe, & S. Reh (Eds.), Ethnographie und differenz in pädagogischen Feldern (pp. 119–132). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R. (1991). Philosophy and the idea of freedom. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., & Eagleton, T. (1992). Doxa and common life. New Left Review, January/February 1992, p. 113.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction 1970. Théorie du systèmed'enseignement. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  11. Carr, W. (1995). For education: Towards critical educational inquiry. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Foley, D. E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 469–490. doi:10.1080/09518390210145534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Hammersley, M. (2006). Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan, S., & Yeomans, D. (1995). Critical ethnography: Problems in contemporary theory and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 389–408. doi:10.1080/0142569950160307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kvale, S. (1995). Interviews. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–278. doi:10.17763/haer.56.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). London/New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Malott, C. (2010). Policy and research in education: A critical pedagogy for educational leadership. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. McLaren, P. (2000). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the pedagogy of revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  22. Postone, M. (2003). Time, labor and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marxist critical theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Soyini Madison, D. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Troman, G. (2006). Editorial. Ethnography and Education, 1(1), 1–2. doi:10.1080/17457820500512671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  26. Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wolfrey, J. (2000). In perspective: Pierre Bourdieu. International Socialism Journal, 87. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/20924178/Wolfreys-Jim-In-Perspective-Pierre-Bourdieu
  28. Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden