Children and Childhoods, Methodologies of
Early childhood education methodologies have gone through philosophical upheaval and various ontological and research design related changes during the last decades. First epistemological and later ontological shifts have brought into attention childhoods as epistemologically instable structures, always already suspect for questioning and fertile ground for deconstruction often highlighting subject as decentered and children as connections within more than human assemblages and fields of relations. These shifts have altered the ways in which early childhood education is being theorized, studied, and researched.
Early childhood education, similar to many other fields, has gone through philosophical upheaval and various ontological and methodological changes. For example, the authors of Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Care and Educationdescribed how the dominant positivist theoretical perspective common in the USA and other...
- Bloch, M. N., Swadener, B. B., & Cannella, G. S. (2014). Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism: A reader (Vol. 50). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kouri, S., & Smith, J. (2013). What's under the dirt? Wondering as a transformation of self. Relational Child and Youth Care Practice, 26(2), 42.Google Scholar
- Nxumalo, F. (2012). Unsettling representational practices: Inhabiting relational becomings in early childhood education. Child & Youth Services, 33(3), 22.Google Scholar
- Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2012). Postcolonial entanglements: Unruling stories. Child & Youth Services, 33(3), 14.Google Scholar