Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters


  • Manuel AnselmiEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_209


Analyzing educational phenomena means understanding factors which are not merely pedagogical but above all social. This is especially true for the Latin American context, where some social and power structures strongly influence educational activity as, for example, populism, which before being a political reality is a social phenomenon interwoven in the fabric of the population. Aspects of the populist mentality which affect institutional education programming are reproduced through educational devices. Thus there exists a deep correlation between education and populism: to understand the first, we must not neglect to study the second.

Populism is a political phenomenon which has returned to affect many political and social contexts of the globe in the last few decades after a season in which it had seemed relegated to only a few areas like Latin America. By populism we mean a power relationship based upon a direct rapport between a charismatic leader and the people...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  2. De la Torre, C. (2007). Es el populismo la forma constitutiva de la democracia Latinoamericana? In J. Aibar (Ed.), Vox populi. Populismo y democracia en Latinoamérica (pp. 55–83). Ciudad de México, México: Flacso.Google Scholar
  3. Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Londres: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Panizza, F. (2013). What do we mean when we talk about populism? In C. de la Torre & A. Cynthia (Eds.), Latin American populism in the twenty first century (pp. 85–117). Baltimore/Washington, DC: The Johns Hopkins University/Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  7. Shils E. (1956) The torment of secrecy: The background & consequences of American security policies. Chicago, IL: Dee.Google Scholar
  8. Van Teun, D. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Weyland, K. (1996). Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(3), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PerugiaPerugiaItaly