Skip to main content

Reconsidering Aesthetics and Everyday Life

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Why should the lamp or the house be an art object, but not our life? (Foucault 1991, p. 350)

Introduction

When considering the career of the treatment of the topic of aesthetics (defined, hereafter, as the operationalization and application of form, taste, self-stylization, and the creative imagination to the demands of contemporary life) in the educational field, one is struck by a striking bifurcation. Mainstream and liberal curriculum standard-bearers such as Eliot Eisner (1997, 2005) writing on the topic have gone down the path of more or less insulating aesthetics within self-enclosing disciplinary frames of reference emphasizing self-referentiality, connoisseurship, and the maverick-like qualities of artistic producers. This orientation might be called, after Pierre Bourdieu, the “charismatic approach” (1993, p. 76) in which the artist and the aesthetic object are judged by art-qua-art criteria shorn from the social environment. Aesthetic conversations within this paradigm brush...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aidi, H. (2014). Rebel music. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Raud, R. (2015). Practices of selfhood. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1997). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (2005). Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 340–372). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Maharaj, S. (2001). Annotations: Modernity and difference, no. 6. London: Institute of International Visual Arts (INIVA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (2013). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global-economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron McCarthy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

McCarthy, C. (2016). Reconsidering Aesthetics and Everyday Life. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_80-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_80-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics