Skip to main content

Evidentialism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 79 Accesses

Introduction

When it comes to figuring out what one should believe one looks to the evidence. If one wants to know the best practices for avoiding a particular illness, one should read up on the latest evidence on how the illness is spread and the proper precautions to take. If one wants to figure out whether a particular politician is deserving of one’s vote, one seeks out evidence about her stance on various issues, her track record, and so on. In general, if one wants to make an informed decision, one goes with the evidence. As David Hume famously said, “A wise man…proportions his belief to the evidence” (1748/1955: 118). Thomas Reid, perhaps overly optimistic about the wishes of some people, similarly claimed “To believe without evidence is a weakness which every man is concerned to avoid, and which every man wishes to avoid” (1785/1941: 178). To put it plainly, it seems commonsensical that if one wants to get to the truth, one believes according to the evidence.

Despite the fact...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chisholm, R. (1977). Theory of knowledge (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies, 48, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2008). Evidence. In Q. Smith (Ed.), Epistemology: New essays (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., & Feldman, R. (2011). In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents (pp. 283–323). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, K. (2000). Ought we to follow our evidence? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (2011). Toward a synthesis of reliabilism and evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism’s troubles, reliabilism’s rescue package. In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents (pp. 254–280). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1748/1955). In C. W. Hendel (Ed.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. (2014). Evidence. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence/

  • McCain, K. (2015). Is forgotten evidence a problem for evidentialism? Southern Journal of Philosophy, 53, 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T. (1785/1941). In A. D. Woozley (Ed.), Essays on the intellectual powers of man. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Dougherty, T. (Ed.). (2011). Evidentialism and its discontents. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry: Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. (2014). Evidentialism and epistemic justification. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. (2015). No knowledge without evidence. Journal of Philosophical Research, 40, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. (Ed.). (2018). Believing in accordance with the evidence: New essays on evidentialism. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittag, D. (2019). Evidentialism. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/evidenti/#SH3a

  • Stapleford, S., & McCain, K. (2020). Bound by the evidence. In K. McCain & S. Stapleford (Eds.), Epistemic duties: New arguments, new angles. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin McCain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McCain, K. (2020). Evidentialism. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_692-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_692-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics