Skip to main content

Knowledge Creation Transfer and Commodification

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 37 Accesses

This entry focuses on two key notions, knowledge transfer and commodification in the context of higher education. Knowledge transfer can be understood as a set of practices (epistemological, social, material, or technological), which are formed at the site of creation, and then transferred to another site in which a problem or need has been identified, and this is thought to be a solution to the problem or potentially able to meet this need. Previously such processes were conceived of as simple, straightforward, and unambiguous relocations from one site to another. It is now generally accepted that the translocation of epistemic, material, social, or technological objects is complex, nonlinear, and unpredictable, because these objects cannot be easily abstracted from their original political, economic, and social contexts. What is missing from most transfer mechanisms therefore is a proper understanding of these entities and transformative processes, resulting in technical solutions,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2010). Three generations of complexity theories: Nuances and ambiguities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. (2002). Critical realism and marxism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1927). Fetishism (trans: Strachey, J.). In The complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XXI, pp. 147–157). London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1990) [1867]. Capital, volume I (trans: Fowkes, B.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of strong emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2008). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method and practice. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Scott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Scott, D. (2018). Knowledge Creation Transfer and Commodification. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_632-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_632-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics