Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Social Capital and Education

  • Veronika Tašner
  • Slavko Gaber
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_584-1

Introduction

The basic idea of the concept of social capital embraces the importance of relations between actors in social space established as networks of the individuals in communities and society. Numerous and even ideologically different and contradicting conceptualizations agree that there are several reasons to acknowledge the importance of social networks that enable social ties and bring benefits to their members. Strong social networks as result of common beliefs, sentiments, values, and practices are, namely, supposed to generalize reciprocity and significantly strengthen social collaboration and coherence in contemporary plural and highly individualized and diversified democracies. Coherent networks promote social interaction (good faith, confidence); reduce the level of anomie, crime, etc.; and provide a productive arena for democratic participation of active citizens. As such, social capital is, in addition to economic capital and in combination with cultural capital and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoire. Actes de la recherché en sciences sociales, 31, 2–3.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In P. Brown, A. Halsey, & H. Lauder (Eds.), Education culture, economy, society. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  3. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature. A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Durkheim, E. (1893/1997). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim E. (1897/1951). Suicide: A study in sociology. (J. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.) New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Field, J. (2006). Social capital. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gemacher, E., et al. (2006). Sozial Kapital. Eenue Zugänge zu gesellschaftlichen Kräftlichen Kräften. Budapest: Mandelbaum Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Hsung, R. M., & Breiger, R. L. (2009). Contexts of social capital: Social networks in market communities and families. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Oxfam. (2017). An economy for the 99%. It’s time to build a human economy that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few. Oxford: Oxfam International. www.Oxfam.org. Retrived 1.2.2017.Google Scholar
  12. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scrivens K., & Smith C. (2013). Four interpretations of social capital: An agenda for measurement. (OECD Working Papers, 2013/06). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Wacquant, L. P. D. (1998). Negative social capital: state break down and social destitution in America’s urban core. The Netherlands Journal of the Built Environmnet, 13(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wallerstein, I., Collins, R., Mann, M., Derligian, G., & Calhoun, C. (2013). Does capitalism have a future? Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationLjubljana UniversityLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education/Centre for Education Policy StudiesLjubljana UniversityLjubljanaSlovenia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mitja Sardoč
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Research InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia