Skip to main content

Educational Justice: Equality Versus Adequacy

  • 92 Accesses

The debate on justice in education has long been focused on the idea of equality. Those who criticize education systems for being unjust often point to inequalities within these systems. In this respect, they often use the notion of equality of opportunity. In recent years, however, an alternative to equality-based conceptions of educational justice has arisen. Adequacy-oriented accounts claim that we should consider an education system as just, if all students can gain an adequate education. In this view, it is not necessary to distribute education (or educational opportunity) equitably among the students. This idea arose in American public discourse, and in legislation regarding education, and was taken up in philosophical theory (Anderson 2007; Satz 2007; see also Koski and Reich 2007).

In what follows, the main lines of argument in the debate between philosophical adherents of equality and adequacy in education are outlined. This is a debate within the context of distributive...

Keywords

  • Adequate View
  • Equally Talented
  • Meritocratic Principles
  • Brighouse
  • Educational Equality

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality. Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2007). Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics, 117(4), 595–622.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. (2002). School choice and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2008). Putting educational equality in its place. Education Finance and Policy, 3(4), 444–466.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014). The place of educational equality in educational justice. In K. Meyer (Ed.), Education, Justice, and the Human Good (pp. 14–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. (2014). Educational equality: Luck egalitarian, pluralist and complex. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(1), 70–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics, 98(1), 21–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koski, W., & Reich, R. (2007). When ‘adequate‘ isn’t: The retreat from equity in educational law and policy and why it matters. Emory Law Journal, 56(3), 545–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117(4), 623–648.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G. (2012). Fair educational opportunity and the distribution of natural ability: Toward a prioritarian principle of educational justice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 472–491.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Giesinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Giesinger, J. (2018). Educational Justice: Equality Versus Adequacy. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_546-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_546-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences