Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Educational Justice: Equality Versus Adequacy

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_546-1

The debate on justice in education has long been focused on the idea of equality. Those who criticize education systems for being unjust often point to inequalities within these systems. In this respect, they often use the notion of equality of opportunity. In recent years, however, an alternative to equality-based conceptions of educational justice has arisen. Adequacy-oriented accounts claim that we should consider an education system as just, if all students can gain an adequate education. In this view, it is not necessary to distribute education (or educational opportunity) equitably among the students. This idea arose in American public discourse, and in legislation regarding education, and was taken up in philosophical theory (Anderson 2007; Satz 2007; see also Koski and Reich 2007).

In what follows, the main lines of argument in the debate between philosophical adherents of equality and adequacy in education are outlined. This is a debate within the context of distributive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality. Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2007). Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics, 117(4), 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brighouse, H. (2002). School choice and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2008). Putting educational equality in its place. Education Finance and Policy, 3(4), 444–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014). The place of educational equality in educational justice. In K. Meyer (Ed.), Education, Justice, and the Human Good (pp. 14–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Calvert, J. (2014). Educational equality: Luck egalitarian, pluralist and complex. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics, 98(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koski, W., & Reich, R. (2007). When ‘adequate‘ isn’t: The retreat from equity in educational law and policy and why it matters. Emory Law Journal, 56(3), 545–617.Google Scholar
  9. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117(4), 623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schouten, G. (2012). Fair educational opportunity and the distribution of natural ability: Toward a prioritarian principle of educational justice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mitja Sardoč
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Research InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia