Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Assessment and Parents

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_538-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Parents are important educational stakeholders, and their relationship with assessment is bi-directional in that they both influence their child’s results and are also influenced by those results. The term parent is used to refer to anyone fulfilling parental or guardian roles (i.e., caring for and making educational decisions on behalf of the child). Hence, in addition to or instead of a biological parent, this person could be a grandparent, step-parent, carer, foster parent, adoptive parent, other relative, guardian, or, in some cultures, a collective group of adults.

While parents do not generally have any direct say in how their child is assessed [although parent opinion does impact on assessment policy (Buckendahl 2016)], many parents actively interpret and use assessment data, whether to better understand their own child’s progress or to form opinions about the quality...

Keywords

Assessment Data Assessment Practice Multiple Choice Test Assessment Policy Intuitive Assumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bong, M. (2008). Effects of parent–child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, H. I., & Mislevy, R. (2005). Intuitive Test Theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The public understanding of assessment in educational reform in the United States. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 52–71. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). The future of assessment as a human and social endeavour. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 506–523). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Buckendahl, C. W. (2016). Public perceptions about assessment in education. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 454–471). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Carless, D., & Lam, R. (2014). The examined life: perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3–13, 42(3), 313–329. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.689988.Google Scholar
  7. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parental education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1023/a:1009048817385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, K., Collins, J., Benjamin, S., Nind, M., & Sheehy, K. (2004). SATurated models of pupildom: Assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 801–817. doi:10.1080/0141192042000279512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, L. R. (2015, April 16–20). Reviewing research on parent attitudes towards school assessment: Implications for classroom assessment practices. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Mansell, W. (2013). Misleading the public understanding of assessment: Wilful or wrongful interpretation by government and media. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 128–138. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  13. Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2004). O le tala ia Lita-Lita’s story: The challenge of reporting achievement to parents. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39(1), 91–112.Google Scholar
  16. Vogl, E., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions that matter to achievement: Student feelings about assessment. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 111–128). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Social WorkThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand