Skip to main content

Indoctrination and the Un-growth of Morality

  • 270 Accesses

Synonyms

Indoctrination; Critical thinking; Gadamer; Habermas

Introduction

The concept of indoctrination means unethical influencing in a teaching or learning situation imposed by teacher, teaching content, or educational institution (see Snook 1972; Hare 1964; Cuypers and Haji 2006; Kilpatric 1972; Puolimatka 2001). When successful indoctrination causes infiltrating (drilling, inculcating, etc.) concepts, attitudes, beliefs, and theories into an individual’s mind by passing his or her free and critical deliberation (Huttunen 2003). When on a general level we define indoctrination in this pejorative way, it is easy to reject indoctrination. Its rejection means that we condemn the indoctrinative as teaching morally wrong and demand that teachers, parents, textbooks, or educational institutions should not endorse it. One major reason for indoctrination being reprehensible is that indoctrination prevents moral growth or it represents moral un-growth. According to Richard Mervyn Hare, the...

Keywords

  • Critical Thinking
  • Communicative Action
  • Teaching Content
  • Communicative Teaching
  • Mature Person

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cornwall: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (1994). Education as practical intersubjectivity: Towards a critical-pragmatic understanding of education. Educational Theory, 44(3), 299–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cuypers, S., & Haji, I. (2006). Education for critical thinking: Can it be non-indoctrinative? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(6), 723–743.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1956). Education and sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1977). Studies in social and political theory. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action I. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). On the logic of social science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt Am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1964).Adolescent into adults. In Teoksessa T. H. B. Hollins (toim.), Aims in education – The philosophical approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, R. (1991). Jürgen Habermas – Critic in the public sphere. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, D. (1978). The critical circle – Literature, history and philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen, R. (2003). Habermas and the problem of indoctrination. Encyclopaedia of Philosophy of Education. Internet: http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=habermas_and_the_problem_of_indoctrination

  • Huttunen, R. (2009). Habermas, Honneth and education: The significance of Jürgen Habermas’s and Axel Honneth’s critical theories to education. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1982). Should intellectual history take a linguistic turn? – Reflection of the Habermas-Gadamer debate. In D. LaCapra & L. Kaplan (Eds.), Modern European intellectual history: Reappraisal and new perspectives (pp. 86–110). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2015a). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? Internet: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/kant/enlightenment.htm

  • Kant, I. (2015b). On education. Internet: http://ziveuniverzity.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Kant-On-Education.pdf

  • Kilpatric, W. H. (1972). Indoctrination and respect for persons. In I. A. Snook (Ed.), Concepts of indoctrination. Lancashire: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P., & Littleton, K. (1999). Social process in children’s learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K. (2000). Re-thinking collaborative learning: An overview. In R. Joiner et al. (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 248–258). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J. (1991). Kommunikatives Handeln und Pädagogisches Handeln. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (1978). The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MITT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld, D. (1991). Modernity and hermeneutics: A critical-theoretical rejoinder. In H. J. Silverman (Ed.), Gadamer and hermeneutics (pp. 163–177). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhauer, K. (1972). Theorien zum Erziehungsprozess. München: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puolimatka, T. (2001). Spinoza’s theory of teaching and indoctrination. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(3–4), 397–410. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2001.tb00278.x/abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1990). Hermeneutics and the critique of ideology. In G. Ormiston & A. Schrift (Eds.), The Hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur (pp. 298–334). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook, I. A. (1972). Indoctrination and education. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvlie, K. (2007). Does paradox count in education? Utbildning & Demokrati, 16(3), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1989). Etica della communicazione o etica dell’interpretazione? In Etica dell’interpretazione. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1989). A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children’s future. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rauno Huttunen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Huttunen, R. (2016). Indoctrination and the Un-growth of Morality. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_419-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_419-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences