Skip to main content

Gilligan-Kohlberg Controversy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Kohlberg started his research on moral development in the mid-1950s when he began to prepare his doctoral thesis. The thesis was presented in 1958 under the title The Development of Modes of Moral Thinking and Choice in the years 10–16 (Kohlberg 1988). Kohlberg takes as a starting point Jean Piaget’s four-staged model of the application of rules and the two types of morality. In his book The Moral Judgement of the Child, Piaget (1983) uses a game of marbles as an example of an extremely complex system of rules, “a kind of jurisprudence of its own.” When adopting the rules, a child goes through four successive stages. The first stage concerns just a purely motor and individual character and thus does not any have significance for Kohlberg, but rest three stages form the foundation of Kohlberg’s theory. Those three Piaget’s stages are the stage of egocentrism (II), the stage of cooperations (III), and the stage of codification of rules (IV). From this study of rules of a game, Piaget...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ataner, A. (2006). Kant on capital punishment and suicide. Kant Studien, 97(4), 452–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabid, S. (1987). The generalized and the concrete other. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 77–95). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, B. (2000). The quest of control and the possibilities of care. In M. Wrathall & J. Malpas (Eds.), Heidegger, coping, and cognitive science – essays in honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. (1986). The genesis of moral domination. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg – consensus and controversy (pp. 363–390). East Sussex: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröber, R. & Nunner-Winkler, G. (1986). “Wertwandel und Moral”. In H. Bertram (Ed.) Gesellschaftlicher Zwang und moralische Autonomie. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1995). Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection. Hypatia, 10(2), 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1998). Remembering Larry. A speech delivered the 23rd annual conference of the association for moral education at Emoru university in november 1997. Journal of Moral Education, 27(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., & Belenky, M. (1980). A naturalistic study of abortion decision. In R. Selma & R. Yando (Eds.), Clinical-developmental psychology (pp. 69–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1984). New maps of development: New visions of maturity. In S. Chess & A. Thomas (Eds.), Annual progress in child psychiatry and child development (pp. 98–116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. In T. Wren (Ed.), Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social science (pp. 224–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1995). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juujärvi, S. (2003). The ethic of care and Its development. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/val/sosps/vk/juujarvi/. Cited 2016 1.9.

  • Kakkori, L., & Huttunen, R. (2012). The Sartre-Heidegger controversy on humanism and the concept of man in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(4), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and sequences – the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgement. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 532–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (The philosophy of moral development, moral stages and the idea of justice, Vol. 1). San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1988). Moral development in education (masters’ theses education). New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Elfenbein, D. (1981). Capital punishment, moral development, and the constitution. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), The philosophy of moral development: Essays on moral development (Vol. 1). SanFrancisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring – a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (1990). Moral relativism and strict universalism. In T. Wren (Ed.), Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social science (pp. 109–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, J. (2000). Heidegger and the ethics of care. Nursing Philosophy, 1, 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity: Their relationship during child development. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1983). The moral judgement of the child. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoe, E. (1998). Ethic of care: Issues in moral development. In E. Skoe & A. von der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross-national and life-span perspective (pp. 143–170). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. (1998). Ego development and the ethical voices of justice and care: An Eriksonian interpretation. In P. M. Westenberg, A. Blasi, & L. Cohn (Eds.), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical and clinical investigations (pp. 163–180). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leena Kakkori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kakkori, L., Huttunen, R. (2016). Gilligan-Kohlberg Controversy. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_417-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_417-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics