Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Adapting Pedagogy for Formative Assessment

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_394-1


Assessment for Learning is an accepted approach to pedagogy in many countries where the purpose of assessment is to provide feedback and guidance to inform future learning. Both teachers and learners are involved, but ultimately it is the learner that needs to take action. Adapting pedagogy to make room for feedback and action is a complex process that takes time and effort to evolve.

Classroom Assessment

Black and Wiliam’s (1998) survey of evidence linking assessment with improved learning has significantly influenced how educators and policymakers have conceptualized classroom assessment over the last three decades. Within classroom activities, teachers are able to collect data on student understanding from the way learners answer questions, the questions they raise, and the quality of the artifacts they produce. If this assessment information is then interpreted and used by teachers, students, and their peers, to make decisions and take action to enhance learning, the...


Formative Assessment Professional Learning Classroom Activity Individual Teacher Correct Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education, 18(4), 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DfES. (2007). Assessment for learning 8 schools project report. Retrieved July 9, 2015, from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk
  5. Harrison, C. (2013). Developing STEM classroom assessment practices. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 347–358I). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison, C., & Howard, S. (2009). Inside the primary black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: GLAssessment.Google Scholar
  7. Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education, 16(3), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Looney, J. (2007). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress towards a seamless system? OECD Education Working Paper No. 58.Google Scholar
  9. OfSTED. (2010). The national strategies: A review of impact (080270), February 2010. Ref 070244.Google Scholar
  10. Perrenoud, P. (1991). Towards a pragmatic approach to formative evaluation. In P. Weston (Ed.), Assessment of pupil achievement (pp. 79–101). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  11. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control. Part one. Wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 19. 119–144.Google Scholar
  13. Stiggins, R. (2007). Conquering the formative assessment frontier. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 8–28). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 18(4), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Torrance, H. (2015). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854.Google Scholar
  16. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s CollegeLondonUK