Skip to main content

Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science Education

Synonyms

Education; Epistemology; Learning; Science

Introduction

Inquiry teaching is one approach for communicating the knowledge and practices of science to learners. While inquiry approaches to science education offer potential learning opportunities, they also pose constraints on what might be available to learn. Inquiry teaching and learning have a history in science education that warrants analysis from pedagogical and philosophical perspectives. Pedagogical arguments for inquiry approaches are grounded in social epistemology, which makes clear the need for building from extant disciplinary knowledge of a relevant social group in order to learn through inquiry. Establishing a social epistemology in educational settings provides opportunities for students to engage in ways of speaking, listening, and explaining that are part of constructing knowledge claims in science. This perspective on epistemology emphasizes the importance of dialectical processes in science learning. Thus, an...

Keywords

  • Science Education
  • Scientific Practice
  • Knowledge Claim
  • Socioscientific Issue
  • Relevant Community

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (trans: Lenhardt, C. & Nicholsen, S. W.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99–117; 288–291). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J. (2014). Inquiry teaching and learning: Philosophical considerations. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1363–1380). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P. (1998). Philosophy of science: An overview for educators. Science & Education, 7, 1–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. (1960). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3–103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory J. Kelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kelly, G.J. (2016). Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science Education. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_36-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_36-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences