Skip to main content

Peirce and Embedded Philosophy of Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 46 Accesses

Introduction

Peirce’s contribution to educational philosophy is embedded within his phenomenological construct. This educational philosophy is general enough to provide for nearly all learning needs and interests, yet specific enough to provide for widespread testing and verification (Hechinger 1960). Peirce’s phenomenology provides a sturdy foundation for the development of educational practices that can elicit essential and overarching learning capabilities in young children through adults (Chiasson 2008a, b).

Discussion

Phenomenology is descriptive; it is the study of appearances, which requires facility with proto-reasoning skills, the skills of a good phenomenologist (Peirce 1935, Vol. 5, para. 41). These are skills required for eventual facility with critical thought.

Thus, a good critical thinker in a Peircean sense is first of all a good phenomenologist; that is, someone who can observe without judging, relate in multiple ways, and interpret without deciding. Facility with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chiasson, P. (2008a). Reasoning readiness – The very first R. Signs-International Journal of Semiotics, 114–145. Retrieved from http://vip.iva.dk/signs/Articles.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, P. (2008b). Peirce’s design for thinking, a philosophical gift for children. In M. A. Taylor, H. Schreier, & P. Ghiraldelli Jr (Eds.), Pragmatism and children: International philosophical perspectives (pp. 1–27). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Editions Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, P. & Tristan, J. (2012). Phenomenology, chapter 9. In Relational thinking styles and natural intelligence. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. S. & Chiasson, P. S. (1981). Relational thinking styles: Learning to see the forest and the trees. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(8), 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechinger, F. M. (1960). Student’s I.Q.’s rise in California tests. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1932). In Hartshorne & Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. I–II [electronic edition]). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1935). Hartshorne & Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. V–VI [electronic edition]). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggiani, F. (2014). Truth and satisfaction: The gist of pragmatism. In T. Thellefsen & B. Sorensen (Eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words (pp. 537–543). Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, A. (1960). Design for thinking. Palo Alto: Pacific Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phyllis Chiasson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Chiasson, P. (2016). Peirce and Embedded Philosophy of Education. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_353-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_353-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics