Skip to main content

Openness and Power

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory


The politics of open education; The politics of openness; The political economy of open education; The political economy of openness; Agency, authority and open education; Agency, authority and openness


Openness as a set of practices has received less attention from practitioners and researchers than the specifics of producing and distributing open educational resources (OERs) or engaging in open education through innovations like massive online open courses (MOOCs). As a result, openness as a philosophical position and its relationships to power inside and outside formal educational contexts has also remained relatively undeveloped to date. However, it is possible to identify key arguments that enable the relationship between openness and power to be framed.

  1. 1.

    Who defines openness, and what remains open or closed, inside and outside formal educational contexts? This includes the relations of power between transnational bodies, state agencies, education...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions


  • Anderson, V., McKenzie, M., Allan, S., Hill, T., McLean, S., Kayira, J., Knorr, M., Stone, J., Murphy, J., & Butcher, K. (2015). Participatory action research as pedagogy: Investigating social and ecological justice learning within a teacher education program. Teaching Education, 26(2), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (2015). Knowledge infrastructures and the inscrutability of openness in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eve, M. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FLOK Society. (2014). General framework document. (FLOK Society, 2014), Accessed 24 Sept 2015.

  • Hall, R., Atkins, L., Fraser. J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The digiLit leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.

  • Johnson, J. A. (2013). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(4), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Mourik Broekman, P., Hall, G., Byfield, T., Hides, S., & Worthington, S. (2014). Open education: A study in disruption. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, A. (2014). From “Open” to justice #OpenCon2014. (HackEducation, 2014). Accessed 24 Sept 2015.

  • Weems, L. (2013). Difference, power, and the limits of openness. In Urbana, Ill.: Philosophy of Education Society, (pp. 20–23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, J. (2012). Open education: From the freedom of things to the freedom of people. In M. Neary, H. Stevenson, & L. Bell (Eds.), Towards teaching in public: Reshaping the modern university (pp. 133–147). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Hall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hall, R. (2016). Openness and Power. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics