Openness as a set of practices has received less attention from practitioners and researchers than the specifics of producing and distributing open educational resources (OERs) or engaging in open education through innovations like massive online open courses (MOOCs). As a result, openness as a philosophical position and its relationships to power inside and outside formal educational contexts has also remained relatively undeveloped to date. However, it is possible to identify key arguments that enable the relationship between openness and power to be framed.
Who defines openness, and what remains open or closed, inside and outside formal educational contexts? This includes the relations of power between transnational bodies, state agencies, education...
- Social Justice
- Intellectual Capital
- Educational Context
- Open Education
- Education Provider
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Anderson, V., McKenzie, M., Allan, S., Hill, T., McLean, S., Kayira, J., Knorr, M., Stone, J., Murphy, J., & Butcher, K. (2015). Participatory action research as pedagogy: Investigating social and ecological justice learning within a teacher education program. Teaching Education, 26(2), 179–195.
Edwards, R. (2015). Knowledge infrastructures and the inscrutability of openness in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 251–264.
Eve, M. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FLOK Society. (2014). General framework document. (FLOK Society, 2014), http://en.wiki.floksociety.org/w/General_Framework_Document. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.
Hall, R., Atkins, L., Fraser. J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The digiLit leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.
Johnson, J. A. (2013). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(4), 263–274.
van Mourik Broekman, P., Hall, G., Byfield, T., Hides, S., & Worthington, S. (2014). Open education: A study in disruption. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Watters, A. (2014). From “Open” to justice #OpenCon2014. (HackEducation, 2014). http://hackeducation.com/2014/11/16/from-open-to-justice/. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.
Weems, L. (2013). Difference, power, and the limits of openness. In Urbana, Ill.: Philosophy of Education Society, (pp. 20–23).
Winn, J. (2012). Open education: From the freedom of things to the freedom of people. In M. Neary, H. Stevenson, & L. Bell (Eds.), Towards teaching in public: Reshaping the modern university (pp. 133–147). London: Continuum.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hall, R. (2016). Openness and Power. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_222-1
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences